Search Results for "commercial exploitation"

318 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 318 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition Against Demolition of Building Declared Dilapidated — Municipal Corporation Directed to Follow Procedure Under MMC Act Before Demolition. Tenants' Right to Hearing Upheld Under Sections 354 and 488 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

The petitioners, eleven tenants residing in a building called Habib Terrace in Kurla, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petitions in Shareholder Dispute Over Appointment of Arbitrator. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate Disputes Arising from Share Subscription and Shareholders' Agreement.

The judgment concerns four arbitration petitions filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising out of disputes between...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Removal of Land Reservation for Architects' Association. State's Power to Modify Development Plan Under Section 31 of MRTP Act Upheld; No Vested Right in Reservation.

The petitioner, Indian Institute of Architects, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, filed a writ petition under Article 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of Daily Wagers Challenging Termination by Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. — Petitioners Failed to Prove 240 Days of Continuous Service Under Section 25-B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment pertains to four writ petitions filed by daily wagers (Kisan Atmaram Kasti, Hari Shravan Randive, Manohar Shripat Sakharkar, and Yogeshwa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition Seeking Garnishee Order Against Third Party in Arbitral Proceedings. Interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be granted against a non-signatory to the arbitration agreement without a prima facie case of liability.

The petitioner, Jatin Keshruwala, sole proprietor of Janvi Production, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Workers Challenging Industrial Court Order Refusing Stay of Union Election. Held that the Industrial Court's order was not perverse and did not suffer from any jurisdictional error, and the writ court's supervisory jurisdiction did not warrant interference.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by 25 workers (appellants) against an order of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing thei...