Search Results for "bribe"

749 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 749 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nivrutti s/o Ganpati Sadekar, was a Junior Assistant in the Education Department of Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The complainant, Balaji...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction and Unreliable Evidence. Demand of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Special Judge at Thane acquitting the respondent, Rajendragiri Vikramgiri Gosavi, for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti Corruption Bureau, Bhandara, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 29.11.2013 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent, Prabhakar Uddarwar, who was a Nazul Surveyor in the office of Taluka Inspec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand for Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of the Special Court (ACB), Nagpur, dated 6th April 2009, which acquitted the respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as trap witnesses were interested and evidence of demand and acceptance was not credible.

The appellant, Chandrakant Kisan Pujari, was a Noting Assistant at the District Industries Centre, Solapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, San...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sukhdeo Laxman Parale, was a Talathi (village revenue officer) in Phulumri, Yavatmal. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Pusad, for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ambadas Devram Chavan, was convicted by the Special Judge (Anti-Corruption), Pune for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) rea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Public Servants in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two appeals against a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Kashinath Vikramji Thorat (accused No...