Search Results for "assessment error"

2266 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2266 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.730 OF 2009

The four writ petitions arose from income tax assessment proceedings concerning the transfer of shares of Idea Cellular Limited (formerly Birla Commun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Appeals Concerning Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, Addressing Safety and Regulatory Measures Under Atomic Energy Act, 1962. The Court Deliberates on Balancing National Energy Policy with Public Apprehensions Stemming from Past Nuclear Incidents.

The case centers on appeals related to the establishment of a nuclear power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu. The judgment begins by acknowledging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Death of Third Party. Insurer Liable Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Despite Stationary Vehicle, as Negligence of Other Driver Proved.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the sons of the deceased, Rukminibai Ramayya Kamtam, who died in a road accident on 16 April 2010...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Assessment Order and Trade Circular as Ultra Vires Section 6A of CST Act. Inter-State Job Work Movement Not Deemed Sale Under Section 6A Because It Does Not Cover Principal-to-Principal Transactions.

The petitioner, a manufacturer and job worker, received spent catalyst from customers within and outside Maharashtra, processed it, and returned the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes VAT Assessment Order for FY 2013-14 Against Luxembourg-Based Companies Due to Gross Violation of Natural Justice and Backdating of Order. Assessment order found to be pre-dated and based on no notice or hearing, rendering it null and void.

The petitioners, comprising two Luxembourg-based companies (Petitioners 1 and 2) and their Indian group company (Petitioner 3), challenged an assessme...