Search Results for "arbitration and conciliation act 1996"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitration and conciliation act 1996"

2218 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2218 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Court holds that review cannot be used as an appeal and that the arbitrator's appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not subject to review on merits.

8 Jun 2016

The petitioners, Roptonal Ltd (formerly Indian Film Company (Cyprus) Ltd) and Viacom 18 Media Pvt. Ltd., filed a review petition in the Bombay High Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Applications for Appointment of Arbitrator in Partnership Disputes Involving Legal Heirs of Deceased Partner. The Court held that the arbitration clause in the partnership deed is binding on the legal representatives of the deceased partner, and the applicants being daughters and legal heirs are entitled to invoke arbitration.

6 Jun 2022

The judgment concerns four applications filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Priya Rishi Bhuta and another, who ar...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Petitions Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Interim Deposit Order. The Arbitral Tribunal Had Directed Joint and Several Deposit of Rs.190 Crores and Restraint on Property Alienation.

3 Jan 2019

The dispute arose from a Share Holders Agreement (SHA) dated 27 December 2012 and subsequent amendments between the Claimants (investors) and the Resp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Interim Award on Limitation for Lack of Jurisdiction. No part of cause of action arose within Bombay High Court's territorial limits under Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as insurance policy was issued in Kolkata and arbitration was conducted in Kolkata.

31 Jul 2019

The petitioner, United India Insurance Company Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Section 9 Order Due to Insufficiently Stamped MOU. Application Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Held Not Maintainable as Underlying Agreement Was Insufficiently Stamped Under Section 35 of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

22 Aug 2014

The appeal arose from an order dated 30 August 2013 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Thane, allowing an application filed by the respon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Appeal in Joint Development Dispute — Agreement for Sale Contains Arbitration Clause. MoU and Allotment Letter Held Interlinked with Main Agreement, Not Separate Contracts, Hence Disputes Referable to Arbitration Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

11 Nov 2024

The Appellants (BKS Galaxy Realtors LLP and others) filed an Arbitration Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Foreign Award for Lack of Jurisdiction — Seat of Arbitration Determined as London, Not India. Parties' Choice of English Law and London Arbitration Excludes Indian Courts' Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Nov 2011

The petitioner, Sakuma Exports Ltd., a Mumbai-based company, entered into a contract dated 12 January 2010 with the respondent, Louis Drefus Commoditi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Hire Purchase Dispute — Arbitrator Exceeded Jurisdiction by Not Filing Award in Court as Required Under Section 14(2) of Arbitration Act, 1940. The court held that failure to file the award under Section 14(2) is a jurisdictional error and the award is liable to be set aside under Section 30 of the Act.

9 Feb 2024

The appellant, M/s. ICDS Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a claim before an arbitrator against respondent No.1 (hirer...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeal in MSMED Act Dispute Over Facilitation Council's Order. Dispute Involved Whether Rejection Order by Council Constitutes an Award Under Section 18 of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, Affecting Remedy Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

23 Sep 2021

The dispute originated from a commercial transaction where the respondent, a supplier under the Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment in Commercial Appeal No. 38 of 2017: Appeal Against Single Judge’s Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award under MSMED Act. Issues of Limitation, Mis-joinder of Causes of Action, and Territorial Jurisdiction Raised in Challenge to Award for Interest on Delayed Payments.

31 Aug 2017

The appellant, M/s. Delton Electricals, a partnership firm and small scale industrial unit, filed Original Application No. 1 of 2005 before the Micro ...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)