Search Results for "admitted sum"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "admitted sum"

5328 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5328 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Eviction Suit — Proper Court Fee Paid Under Section 41(2) of KCF & SV Act. Suit for Ejectment of Tenant Valued at Rs.7,15,000/- Based on Annual Rent and Premium, Held to Be Correctly Valued Under Section 41(2) of Karnataka Court Fee and Suits Valuation Act, 1958.

15 Feb 2024

The respondent, claiming to be the owner of the suit schedule property and alleging that the petitioners are tenants, filed O.S.No.256/2016 before the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Attachment and Proposed Sale of Residential Bungalow under Income Tax Act, 1961, on Ground of Limitation. Petitioner Contends That Tax Recovery Officer's Action Is Time-Barred Under Rule 68B of Second Schedule.

5 Jun 2017

The petitioner, a 60-year-old Indian citizen, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash and set aside the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition Challenging Election on Ground of Office of Profit — Chairman of Goa Khadi and Village Industries Board Not an Office of Profit Under Article 191(1)(a) of Constitution. The court held that the Board is a statutory body with independent funds and the Chairman's honorarium does not constitute profit.

27 May 2005

The petitioner, an unsuccessful candidate in the 2002 Goa Legislative Assembly election for the Siolim constituency, filed an election petition under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Contractor's Appeal in ONGC Arbitration Dispute Over Conversion Rate for Reimbursement of Spares and Consumables. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal's Determination of Conversion Rate Was Not Patently Illegal and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

31 Jul 2015

The case involves two appeals arising from a common order dated 19 September 2005 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court under Sect...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Assault Case — Conviction Under Sections 324, 323, 341 IPC Read with Section 34 IPC Upheld. Court finds concurrent findings of fact based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence, no grounds for interference in revision.

11 Nov 2019

The criminal revision petition was filed by the petitioners/accused challenging the judgment dated 21.01.2011 passed by the II-Additional District and...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation Rates in Land Acquisition Case - Landholders Seek Clarification on Earlier Judgment. The Court upheld the compensation assessment at Rs.29,77,333 per acre for lands from villages Bas Khusla, Bas Haria, and Dhana, with statutory benefits, and directed compliance with the return of excess compensation as per the earlier judgment under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

8 Apr 2021

The Supreme Court dealt with miscellaneous applications filed by landholders from villages Bas Khusla, Bas Haria, and Dhana, seeking clarification on ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favor of PepsiCo Due to Absence of Valid Arbitration Agreement. The Court Held That Without a Signed Contract Containing an Arbitration Clause, the Arbitrator Lacked Jurisdiction to Entertain the Claim.

17 Apr 2012

The case involves a challenge by PepsiCo India Holding Pvt. Ltd. (Petitioner) against an arbitral award dated 7 January 2010 passed by a sole arbitrat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Malicious Prosecution — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Malice and Absence of Reasonable and Probable Cause. The court held that the plaintiff must establish both malice and lack of reasonable and probable cause for the prosecution, and that the acquittal in the criminal case does not automatically entitle the plaintiff to damages.

27 Apr 2005

The plaintiff, Shyam Sunder Bubna, filed a suit for malicious prosecution against M/s. Savani Transport Private Limited and its branch manager, Akhtar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Challenging Arbitral Award. Dispute Related to Charter Hire Agreement for Offshore Drilling, Involving Claims for Lost Equipment, Day Rates, and Demobilisation Fees.

20 Dec 2014

The Bombay High Court considered an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Lt...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Confectionery and Food Drinks Under APMC Act. Confectionery and Food Drinks Are Not 'Agricultural Produce' Under Section 2(a) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, and Hence Not Subject to Market Fee.

18 Aug 2017

The petitioner, Cadbury India Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, manufactures confectionery and food drinks at its ...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)