Search Results for "Suo Moto order"

652 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 652 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders of Tahsildar and Deputy Collector; Remands Tenancy Possession Dispute for Fresh Consideration. Tahsildar Lacked Jurisdiction Under Section 98A of Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950.

The dispute centred on possession of tenancy land protected under the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. The original owner was Madan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Reduction of Debarment Penalty in Solid Waste Tender Dispute. Court Considers Whether Appeal Against Debarment Order Was Maintainable Under Contractor Registration Rules, 1992.

The dispute arose from a tender floated by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) on 08.05.2018 for transportation of municipal solid wast...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices in Tenancy Case Due to 33-Year Delay and Land Conversion -- Proceedings Under Bombay Tenancy Act Barred When Land Converted to Non-Agricultural Use

The petitioners challenged show cause notices issued under Section 84C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding land transactio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Arbitral Tribunal Cannot Appoint Court Receiver Under Section 17 of Arbitration Act. Court Receiver is an Officer of the High Court Subject Only to Chief Justice's Supervision.

The Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay filed a Report seeking directions on whether the Registry should accept matters where an Arbitral Tribunal appo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment for Temple Construction — No Public Interest Violation Found. Court held that allotment of land for a temple under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code does not require public auction and is permissible for religious purposes.

The judgment pertains to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Bapu Shankar Dighe and Dadasaheb Kusabapu Pawar, challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Protection Force Dismissal Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Disciplinary Authority's Disagreement with Inquiry Officer Without Hearing Employee Invalidates Dismissal Under Railway Protection Force Act, 1957.

The respondent, Amar Bahadur Singh, was appointed as a 'Rakshak' in the Railway Protection Force (RPF) of the Central Railway in 1960. On 15 April 198...