Search Results for "Security interest"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Security interest"

4164 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4164 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MIDC Circular Requiring 100% Completion of Work for Payment in Construction Contracts — Circular Held Unreasonable and Arbitrary Under Article 14 of Constitution of India. The court held that a circular requiring 100% completion of work before any payment is made is arbitrary and violative of Article 14, as it does not provide for payment for work done.

23 Oct 2020

The petitioner, M/s Mascot Construction Co., a partnership firm, challenged a Circular dated 27.08.2020 issued by the Maharashtra Industrial Developme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Cyber Terrorism and Espionage in National Security Case. Appellant sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 66-F of Information Technology Act, 2000 and rigorous imprisonment under Official Secrets Act, 1923 for leaking defence data to foreign agents via fake Facebook accounts.

1 Dec 2025

The appellant, Nishant Agrawal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-1, Nagpur in Sessions Case No.726 of 2021 for offences under Section 66...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of NOC Requirement from Naval Authorities for Slum Rehabilitation Project. Security Guidelines and Stop Work Notice Challenged as Arbitrary and Without Statutory Backing.

23 Dec 2013

The petitioners, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to MCGM's Condition Requiring No Objection Certificate from Indian Navy for Occupancy Certificate and Development Permission. Petitioners Argue That Imposition of Such Condition is Arbitrary and Without Statutory Sanction.

21 Jun 2019

The case involves two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. In Writ Petition No. 229 of 2018, M/s S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application Under Rule 133 for Delay in Seeking Adjournment to Judge — Security Order Already Set Aside by Higher Courts. Application Filed Beyond Four-Day Limitation Period Without Sufficient Cause Under Rule 133 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980.

26 Nov 2010

The applicant, Suresh Lachhmandas Raheja, the original plaintiff in Suit No.3190 of 2006, filed an application under Rule 133 of the Bombay High Court...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses HPCL's Challenge to Residential Complex Near Refinery; Upholds Permissions and Finds No Merit in Challenge to D.C. Regulations

12 Apr 2012

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., a Government of India enterprise operating...

Tribunals

NCLAT Allows Appeal by Central Transmission Utility of India Ltd. Against NCLT Order Restraining Termination of Transmission Service Agreement During CIRP. The Appellate Tribunal held that the moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 does not bar termination of a contract for pre-CIRP defaults by the corporate debtor, and that the Resolution Professional cannot compel performance of a contract that has been validly terminated prior to the moratorium.

30 Jun 2021

The appeal was filed by Central Transmission Utility of India Ltd. (CTUIL) against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Hyderabad, da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Height Restrictions Near Naval Air Station — No Violation of Right to Development Found. Height restrictions imposed under Section 9A of the Aircraft Act, 1934 and Rule 44 of the Aircraft Rules, 1937 for safety of aircraft operations are reasonable and not arbitrary.

9 Dec 2022

The petitioners, Vikram Delite Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., Shree Ramkrishn Enterprises, and Parikshit Miglani, filed a writ petition under Arti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Wrongful Arrest of Vessel Case — Duty to Mitigate Under Section 73 Contract Act Does Not Apply to Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. The court held that the undertaking under Rule 941 is a contractual obligation independent of the duty to mitigate damages, and the plaintiff must pay damages as per the undertaking without reduction for failure to mitigate.

5 Nov 2014

The case involves an appeal by Rainbow Ace Shipping S.A., the owner of the vessel MV Rainbow Ace, against an order of the learned single Judge of the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Rafale Deal Case Due to Reliance on Unauthorizedly Removed Secret Documents. Court Holds That Publication of Documents in Newspaper Does Not Confer Right to Use Them in Judicial Proceedings Without Lawful Authority.

10 Apr 2019

The judgment pertains to a preliminary objection raised by the Attorney General regarding the maintainability of a review petition filed by Yashwant S...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)