Search Results for "Securitisation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Securitisation"

419 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 419 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Official Liquidator to Take Possession of Factory Premises Despite Pending BIFR Reference Under SICA, 1985. Section 22 of SICA, 1985 does not bar winding up proceedings under Companies Act, 1956.

11 Aug 2016

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking directions to direct the ex-director of M/s Lifeline Industries Ltd. (in liquidation) to deposit advert...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reserved Judgment on Challenge to Section 84 of Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 and Arbitrator's Appointment. Petitioner Challenged Appointment of Single Arbitrator for All Bank Disputes as Violative of Article 14 of the Constitution and Sought Setting Aside of Arbitral Award.

13 Oct 2017

M/s J. Square Steels Pvt. Ltd. (principal borrower) availed credit facilities from Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank Ltd. in 2005 and defaulted, leading to ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Closes Contempt Petitions Against Alchemist for Non-Payment of Rs. 4.5 Crores to Kotak Mahindra Bank, Directs Payment Subject to High Court Determination. The Court held that the order dated 07.05.2012 was binding until modified, and Alchemist's failure to pay constituted disobedience, but since the amount was deposited, no contempt action was taken.

23 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court of India disposed of contempt petitions filed by Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited (KMBL) against Alchemist Assets Reconstruction Company ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Petition Challenging Ombudsman Award in Favor of Widow in Housing Loan Insurance Claim. Non-Disclosure of Pre-Existing Conditions Not Material to Risk, Ombudsman's Award Upheld.

3 Sep 2025

This case involves a widow, Gauri V. Raut (Respondent No. 2), whose husband, along with her father-in-law and brother-in-law, passed away within a spa...

High Court

High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, adjudicates appeal against order in a suit for specific performance of contract for sale of agricultural land by a public trust. The appeal concerns the validity of an order rejecting an application to restrain a bank from auctioning the land pending the suit.

29 Nov 2006

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Sanction of Scheme of Arrangement Amid BIFR Pendency. Maintainability Under Sections 391 and 394 of Companies Act, 1956 Against Overriding Effect of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Considered.

8 Nov 2006

The petitioner, Ashok Organics Industries Ltd., incorporated in 1973, filed a petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Bank and Employees in Loan Dispute — Dispute Held Purely Civil, No Prima Facie Case of Cheating or Criminal Breach of Trust. Allegations of Forgery and Use of Forged Documents Also Not Made Out, FIR Quashed Under Section 482 CrPC.

2 Aug 2022

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by ICICI Bank Ltd., its employees (Zarin Daruwala, Girish Nayak, Arati Ramakrishnan, Vipul Parmar, K...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Corporate Debtor's Appeal Against Admission of Insolvency Application Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Erstwhile Directors Cannot Maintain Appeal After Appointment of Insolvency Professional, Signaling Paradigm Shift to Inability of Management to Continue if Unable to Pay Debts.

1 Aug 2026

Background: The case arose under the newly enacted Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), which came into force in November-December 2016. The ap...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insolvency Case Under IBC, Holds Prior Consent Under Section 16G of Tea Act Required for Initiation of CIRP Against Tea Gardens Under Central Government Management. The court ruled that the Tea Act, 1953, being a special legislation, requires prior consent of the Central Government for initiating insolvency proceedings under Section 9 of the IBC against a corporate debtor whose tea gardens are under government management.

4 Oct 2019

The case involves a dispute between Duncans Industries Ltd. (the appellant/corporate debtor) and A. J. Agrochem (the respondent/operational creditor) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment in Favor of Asset Managers in Commercial Paper Recovery Suit Despite Pending SICA Appeal. The court held that Section 22 of SICA does not bar recovery suits where BIFR has declined registration, and the defendant failed to raise any triable issue.

5 Feb 2016

The plaintiffs, Pramerica Asset Managers Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed two summary suits against Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd. for recovery of Rs. 25 c...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)