Search Results for "Quit Notice"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Quit Notice"

289 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 289 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

18 Jun 2024

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Inclusion of Teacher in Shalarth ID Despite Appointment in No-Grant School. Approval of Appointment by Education Officer Confers Eligibility for Shalarth ID Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

7 Oct 2025

The petitioners, Swargiya Radhabai Dorlikar Shikshan Sanstha (a registered trust and society running educational institutions), Ravi Madhyamik Vidyala...

High Court

High Court Holds in Review Petition that CPC Amendments under Commercial Courts Act Do Not Apply to Commercial Disputes Below Specified Value. The 120‑day limit for written statement under Order VIII Rule 1 of CPC, 1908 as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is inapplicable to suits where the Specified Value is below Rs. 3 lakhs, even if the suit is before the Commercial Division under the proviso to Section 7.

1 Jun 2019

The dispute arose in a commercial suit where the Plaintiff had determined the Specified Value at Rs. 20,000, which was below the threshold of Rs. 3 la...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Property Dispute Between Mother-in-Law and Daughter-in-Law. Trial Court Restrained Daughter-in-Law from Entering Suit Flat, Allegedly Circumventing Family Court's Order Protecting Her Right to Residence.

19 Sep 2016

The appeal arose from an order dated 19.07.2014 passed by the City Civil Court, Dindoshi, Mumbai, in Notice of Motion No.1959 of 2011 in S.C. Suit No....

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows State Appeal in Freedom Fighters' Pension Case — Upholds Government Order Denying Pension Due to Lack of Proof of Participation. Court Holds That Pension Sanction Order Must Be Based on Documentary Evidence and Not on Conjectures.

7 Jul 2023

The case pertains to a writ appeal filed by the State of Karnataka against the order of a learned Single Judge directing the release of freedom fighte...

High Court

Madras High Court Decrees Recovery of Port Charges in Favor of Chennai Port Trust Against Vessel Owner for Unpaid Berth Hire and Port Dues Under Major Port Trusts Act, 1963. The court held that the statutory charge under Section 64 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 attaches to the vessel and the purchaser is liable for pre-existing dues, and waiver granted to previous owner is not binding on the plaintiff.

23 Jan 2026

The plaintiff, Board of Trustees of the Port of Chennai, filed a suit for recovery of Rs.1,08,84,931/- with interest at 15% per annum from the defenda...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Will Execution Case — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of Suspicious Circumstances. Execution of Will Not Proved as Attesting Witnesses Not Examined and Propounder Failed to Dispel Suspicious Circumstances Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Mr. Anthony Edward D'Aguiar, filed a First Appeal before the Bombay High Court against the judgment and decree dated 30th April 2012 pa...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Under Section 37(1)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Sets Aside Trial Court Order Dismissing Section 9 Application for Injunction. Court holds that existence of arbitration agreement and prima facie case for interim relief must be considered at the stage of Section 9 application, and the trial court erred in dismissing the application without considering the merits.

2 Aug 2017

The appellant, M/s Equestrain Centre for Excellence, filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an in...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Rent Control Eviction Case, Restoring Trial Court's Order on Unauthorized Subletting. High Court's Revisional Interference Found Impermissible as It Reappreciated Evidence Beyond Jurisdictional Limits Under Section 46 of Karnataka Rent Act, 1999.

10 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from eviction proceedings initiated by the landlord against the tenant, a partnership firm, under the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999. The ...

High Court

KAHC010422252008_1

17 Dec 2014

...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)