Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Appeal under Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999. Appeal involves multiple interim applications and stakeholders including developers and financial institutions.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Punjab Sales Tax Act"
329 result(s) found
Found 329 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Reverses High Court's Quashing of FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Court Held That a Preliminary Inquiry Is Not Mandatory Before FIR Registration and the FIR Should Not Be Quashed as It Discloses a Cognizable Offence Based on Source Information.
8 Oct 2021The appeal arose from a judgment of the Telangana High Court dated 11 February 2020, which allowed a writ petition filed by the respondents under Arti...
- 349
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Development Dispute — Upholds Disclosure Directions but Sets Aside Deposit Orders. The court held that while disclosure orders are permissible under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act, a direction to deposit 30% of sale proceeds without a finding of likelihood of dissipation of assets is not sustainable.
17 Dec 2024The petitioners, Arun Bhoomi Corporation and Vijay Kanhaiyalal Joshi, filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and ...
- 459
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Builder's Second Appeals Against RERA Appellate Tribunal Order for Refund with Interest to Homebuyers. Failure to Deliver Possession Within Agreed Time Constitutes 'Default' Under Section 18 of Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, Entitling Allottees to Full Refund with Interest.
20 Feb 2024The appellant, Balaji Construction Company, a promoter, entered into agreements with various allottees for the sale of apartments in a project. The ag...
- 70
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitration Matter — Consent Order Not Stayed as No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Court held that a consent order passed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be stayed unless fraud or lack of jurisdiction is shown.
13 Feb 2013The petitioner, Tata Capital Financial Services Limited, a non-banking finance company, had sanctioned an invoice discounting facility of Rs. 20,00,00...
- 71
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity and Leave Encashment to Resigned Government Employees — Distinguishes Resignation from Voluntary Retirement Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and Maharashtra Civil Services Rules. Resignation after 10 years of service qualifies for gratuity under Section 4 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and Rule 66(3) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1981 is invalid for denying leave encashment on resignation.
20 Jun 2014The Bombay High Court, in a group of three writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, considered the challenge by government emplo...
- 168
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Examines Vires of Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 Amidst Concerns Over Judicial Independence. Petitioners Argue That Provisions on Appointment, Tenure, and Removal of Tribunal Members Undermine the Constitutional Balance of Power.
1 Jan 1970The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions challenging the vires of the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021. The petitioners, led by the Madras Bar Assoc...
- 56
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Merger Control Disclosure Obligations and Limits of CCI's Powers After Approval. The Court Emphasizes That CCI's Authority Must Be Traced to the Act and That Disclosure Must Present the Transaction in Substance.
1 Jan 1970The case arises from an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002, filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC before the Supreme Court...
- 58
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Reforms Tribunal Order in Land Grant Case — Petitioners' Father Was Granted Land Under Rule 43(5) of Karnataka Land Grant Rules, 1969, and the Land Was Not Granted Under the Land Reforms Act. The Assistant Commissioner and Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to initiate proceedings under Sections 79A and 79B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.
7 Jan 2020The petitioners, legal representatives of late D. Ramanatha Reddy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeki...
- 143
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Demolition Notice Under MRTP Act — No Tenancy Rights in Unauthorized Structure. Notice under Section 55(1) of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 for demolition of unauthorized construction held valid as plaintiff failed to prove lawful tenancy or ownership.
29 Apr 2005The appellant, Bales Sardara Paracha, filed a suit in the City Civil Court at Mumbai seeking a declaration that a notice dated 15th December 2004 issu...
- 104
