Search Results for "Proprietary Concern"

387 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 387 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Rent and Business Income Recovery Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Section 100 CPC Appeal Dismissed as No Substantial Question of Law Arises.

The appellant, H.V. Devarajanaidu, was the defendant in O.S.No.312/2016 filed by the respondent, A.V. Ramesh Babu, for recovery of business income and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Quashing of Revisional Order in Execution Proceedings. Decree Against Single Defendant Without Adjudication Held Null and Void Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order VIII Rule 10, Rendering Execution Incompetent.

The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by the appellants under section 38 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking a permanent injunction aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Appellate Authority to Decide Stay Applications in Licence Suspension Cases Under Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. The court held that the appellate authority must promptly decide interim relief to prevent the appeal from becoming infructuous.

The petitioners, who run medical stores and hold licences under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, had their l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Commercial Arbitration Application Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Loan Agreement Contains Valid Arbitration Clause. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate Dispute Over Unpaid Loan Amount of Rs. 1,50,00,000.

The applicant, Aditya Birla Finance Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale in Favor of Flat Purchaser Against Developer and Subsequent Purchasers. Agreement for Sale dated 6th March 1980 declared valid and binding, subsequent agreement dated 4th April 1988 declared bogus and invalid.

The case involves a dispute over the specific performance of an agreement for sale of a flat. The flat purchaser, Dr. Arun Subrao Prabhu, entered into...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Criminal Complaint Case for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 195 CrPC. Private Complaint Not Maintainable for Offences Under Sections 191-192 IPC Committed in Judicial Proceedings.

The case arises from two criminal complaints filed by M/s Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. and another against Prasad Vassudev Keni and others under Sectio...