Search Results for "Merger Scheme"

302 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 302 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Transmission Line Over Private Land, Upholds Validity of Section 164 of Electricity Act, 2003. The Court Held That the Provisions for Laying Electricity Lines Without Prior Consent Are Constitutional as They Provide for Hearing and Compensation.

The petitioners, Jarnail Singh and Surinder Singh, are owners of land in Nagpur over which respondent No.1, Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Court Officers Seeking Parity in Pension and Retirement Benefits with Higher Judicial Officers. Classification of employees into Class I and Class II based on duties and responsibilities is valid and not discriminatory under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, fifteen officers of the High Court of Bombay holding positions such as Registrar, Prothonotary, Commissioner for Taking Accounts, Add...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Software Export Tax Exemption Case. ITAT's finding that assessee's software development services qualify as 'computer software' under Section 10B of Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld.

The present appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Income Tax Department (appellants) against the order dated 19.01.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Levy of VAT on Liquor by Certain Licensees; Alleged Discrimination Between Different Categories of Excise Licence Holders. Petitioners Contend That Notification Exempting Some Dealers While Taxing Others Violates Articles 14, 19, and 304B of the Constitution.

The writ petitions were filed by various licensees under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1967, challenging the constitutional validity of Entry No.59A of th...