WRIT PETITION NO. 2329 OF 2003
21 Dec 2018The petitioners, K.P. Power Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition in 2003 before the Bombay High Court seeking a mandamus to compel ...
Search Results for "MHADA land"
281 result(s) found
Found 281 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes of Batch of Writ Petitions Regarding Encroachments and Treats One as PIL to Monitor Supreme Court Directions. The Court Issued Rule and Heard Matters Finally, but the Complete Order and Findings Were Not Available in the Judgment Excerpt.
19 Sep 2018The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various religious trusts and societies against the Stat...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Landowners' Claim for Interest on Solatium in Land Acquisition Case — Court Holds That Interest on Solatium is Payable as Part of Compensation. Interest on Solatium Directed from Date of Sunder Judgment (19.9.2001) to Date of Actual Payment (28.4.2010) Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
1 Dec 2010The petitioners were landowners whose land had been occupied by Defence authorities since 1942 for defence purposes. An award was passed on 30-05-1995...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Cooperative Housing Dispute — Upholds Cooperative Court's Order for Transfer of Flat. Transfer of share and interest in a tenant co-partnership society requires compliance with by-laws and rules; society cannot refuse transfer without valid reason.
4 Sep 2014The Petitioner, Smt. Geeta Narayan Parvati, was a lecturer and member of Respondent No.2 Society, a tenant co-partnership society registered under the...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs State and Municipal Corporation to Remove Unauthorized Religious Structures in Public Interest Litigation. Illegal Shrines Built After Supreme Court Cutoff Date Must Be Demolished Without Delay, and Older Structures Must Be Categorized for Regularization, Relocation, or Removal.
1 Oct 2016The Public Interest Litigation was filed by Society for Fast Justice and another petitioner highlighting the failure of the State of Maharashtra and t...
- 52
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Developer Removal in Slum Rehabilitation Case Due to Bias — Participation of CEO in Appellate Committee Violates Natural Justice. CEO who passed initial removal order cannot sit as member of High Power Committee hearing appeal against his own order under Slum Rehabilitation Authority regulations.
14 Aug 2012The petitioner, Susme Builders Private Limited, a developer, was selected by the respondent Co-operative Society in 1986 for redevelopment of its prop...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals by Developer in Possession Suits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 100 CPC. Suits for possession based on title and prior possession were decreed; no substantial question of law arose.
17 Sep 2019The appellant, M/s. Samruddhi Developers, a partnership firm, filed four second appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challe...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Ad-Interim Injunction in Arbitration Matter — No Irreparable Harm Shown. Court declines to interfere with interim order restraining redevelopment pending final hearing of arbitration petition under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
27 Apr 2010The appellant, Middle Income Group Cooperative Society Limited, filed an appeal against an ad-interim order dated 29th March 2010 passed by a learned ...
- 123
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Application to Sell Matrimonial Home and Directs Husband to Pay EMIs in Family Court Dispute. The court held that the husband is liable to pay EMIs as maintenance and the wife may sell the property with court supervision to protect the matrimonial home from bank action under the Securitisation Act.
20 Mar 2013The writ petition arose from an order of the Family Court No.7, Mumbai dated 23rd August 2011, which rejected the wife's application for direction to ...
- 97
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Dismissal of Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief. Court Holds That a Prima Facie Case for Interim Measures Exists When There Is a Valid Arbitration Agreement and the Subject Matter of Dispute Is at Risk of Being Frustrated.
20 Oct 2022The appellant, Kalpataru Limited, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the judgment of a learne...
- 74
