Search Results for "Injunction Breach"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Injunction Breach"

1426 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1426 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR Against Witness in Land Dispute Case — No Prima Facie Case for Criminal Breach of Trust or Cheating. Witness's Role Limited to Signing Sale Deed Does Not Attract Criminal Liability Under Sections 406, 420, 423, 120-B IPC.

20 Mar 2026

The present application was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) for quashing of FIR being C.R. No.1-576 of 2007 reg...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Writ Petitions Filed Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Petitioners Sought Declaration That 1977-78 BDA Land Acquisition Had Lapsed Due to Non-Taking of Possession or Non-Payment of Compensation.

14 Dec 2017

These three sets of writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka, all relating to the acquisition of land measuring seven acres in Sur...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 10475 OF 2011

7 Mar 2012

The case involved a partnership firm (Petitioner) engaged in manufacturing soft gelatin pharmaceutical products, and a US corporation (Respondent No.1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Challenging MCGM Notice Under Section 354A of MMC Act — Suit Held Not Maintainable Due to Bar of Section 527 of MMC Act and Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Section 354A(3). The court held that the civil court's jurisdiction is barred when a statute provides a complete mechanism for redressal.

9 Oct 2013

The appellant, M/s. Akash Impex, a registered partnership firm, acquired suit property Gala No.24/25, CTS No. 240-C at Khetani Industrial Estate, Kurl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award on Termination and Repudiation of Master Asset Purchase Agreement. Arbitrator's Finding of Repudiation by Purchaser and Direction for Refund of Consideration under MAPA Considered.

10 May 2013

The dispute arose from a Master Asset Purchase Agreement (MAPA) dated 31st March 2005 between Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. as purchaser and V Hote...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Under Section 37 Against Interim Order Under Section 9 in Property Development Arbitration. The Impugned Order Granted Conditional Relief Including Injunction and Appointment of Receiver Pending Arbitration.

27 Oct 2005

The appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent challenged an order passed by a le...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Regular First Appeal Against Trial Court Decree Declaring Plaintiff as Absolute Owner and Ordering Delivery of Possession. Deemed University's Land Acquisition and Possession Dispute Involving Application of Land Acquisition Act, Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960, and Section 96 of CPC.

6 Jun 2016

The appeal arose from a suit filed by the National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), a deemed university and society registered...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order Refusing to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Commercial Suit — Appellant Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance. The court held that the appellant's failure to appear despite service and the lack of a valid explanation for the delay in filing the application to set aside the decree disentitled it to relief under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

27 Nov 2020

The appellant, BVM Finance Private Limited, was the original defendant No.1 in a commercial suit filed by the respondent No.1, Vistra ITCL (India) Ltd...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, hears a company petition for winding up of Videocon Industries Limited under sections 433(e) and 434(1)(a) read with 439 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petition, filed by an Italian bank, alleges non-payment of Euros 38 million under a Patronage Letter, which the petitioner argues is a guarantee for a loan to a step-down subsidiary.

5 Dec 2013

The petition, Company Petition No. 528 of 2012, was filed by Intesa Sanpaolo S.P.A., an Italian bank, seeking the winding up of Videocon Industries Li...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular First Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Appeal fails as appellants failed to prove title and possession over suit property, and no substantial question of law arose.

17 Mar 2023

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 30.06.2015...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)