Search Results for "IPC 114"

835 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 835 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 661 OF 2005

The case arose from Special Case No. 10 of 2001 before the III Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, where eight accused faced trial on charges of kidnap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative and evidence lacked corroboration.

The appellants, Annayappa @ Krishnappa and Babu, were convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bangalore Rural, for the murder of Munir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of two appellants, Prafulla Vinayak Nage and Atul Shrikrishna Bhadake, under Section 376(2)(g) (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 392, 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Keshav Shriram Kendre, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedpur, for the murder of Bapurao Shamrao Nagargoje, a driver ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Sections 302 and 448 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sri Annappa Bhandary, was convicted by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Udupi (sitting at Kundapura) in S.C.No.29/2018 for o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Zabarsingh Pilya Bhilala, was convicted by the IIIrd Ad hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Achalpur in Sessions Trial 80/1997 for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The present criminal appeals were preferred by the appellants-accused under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction Under Sections 302, 201, 34 IPC in Dismemberment Murder Case. Accused Challenge Life Imprisonment Contending Weak Circumstantial Evidence and Tutored Witnesses.

The case involved the brutal murder and dismemberment of Archideb Bhattacharjee in 2003 after he refused to pay an extortion demand of Rs.40,000 to th...