Search Results for "General Notice"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "General Notice"

12012 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12012 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Ex-Parte Ad-Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit — No Material Suppression Found. The court upheld the order granting injunction and appointing Court Receiver, noting that the defendants' subsequent registration does not bar the plaintiff's claim and that the order was time-limited with liberty to apply for variation.

7 Oct 2022

The case involves a commercial appeal by the original defendants against an ex-parte ad-interim order dated 15th September 2022 passed by a single jud...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal; Upholds Finding that Suit for Specific Performance Is Barred by Limitation. Court Rules Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963 and Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

18 Jul 2018

The case arose from an agreement dated 6.10.1997 between the appellant, Rajesh Dayaldas Narwani, and the respondent, Kanayalal D. Bablani, whereby the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Revenue Authorities in Stamp Duty Undervaluation Cases — Revisional Powers Under Section 47A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Upheld. The Court held that the limitation period for suo motu revision by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority is five years from the date of the order, not from the date of registration.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from orders of the Madras High Court concerning the interpretation of Section 47A of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Airport Appellate Tribunal Order in Eviction Proceedings under Airports Authority of India Act, 1994. Petitioner, an 85-year-old agriculturist, challenged the Tribunal's order confirming eviction from airport premises, raising issues of jurisdiction and unauthorized occupation.

30 Oct 2015

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the order dated 10th July 2013 passed by the Chairperson of the Airport Ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Decides Appeal Regarding Retrospective Reassessment of Property Tax Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Single Judge had Quashed Orders and Demands Reassessing Rateable Value from 1-4-2000.

27 Mar 2006

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai issued special notices in 2001 and 2002 reassessing the rateable value of Dalamal Tower Premises Co-operat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of Civil Revision Applications by Tenants in Eviction Proceeding Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Tenants Raised Issues of Non-Decision of Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Applications, Delayed Judgment, and Misinterpretation of Section 15 of the Rent Act.

4 Aug 2015

The Bombay High Court heard two Civil Revision Applications filed by tenants Vasant Mahadeo Gujar and Smt. Khatija Ismail Panhalkar against the common...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Appeals by Bank in Securitisation Act Case Regarding Maintainability of Civil Suits — The Court Examines Whether Plaints Against Bank Are Barred Under Section 34 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

26 Oct 2018

The litigation arose from a batch of five civil suits filed by several plaintiffs against M/s. Orbit Corporation Ltd. and Axis Bank Limited, concernin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Landlord's Appeal in Eviction Case, Restores Decree; Advocate's No-Instruction Puris Not a Withdrawal of Vakalatnama Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Evasive Litigant Cannot Claim Lack of Opportunity When Advocate Sent RPAD Notice and No Formal Withdrawal of Vakalatnama Occurred.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from a civil suit for possession filed by the landlord-appellant under Sections 16(1)(g) and 16(1)(n) of the Maharashtra Rent Contro...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses State Appeals in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Landowners Entitled to Retain Excess Land After Repeal of Tamil Nadu Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1961. The Court held that since the land had not vested in the State prior to the repeal, the landowners are entitled to retain the excess land under Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Land Ceiling (Repeal) Act, 1999.

29 Jan 2025

The case involves three writ appeals filed by the State of Tamil Nadu and the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) against a common order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Suit for Redemption of Pledged Securities After Loan Default; Plaintiffs Abandoned Main Claim of Transfer Agreement. Pledge Agreement Clause 14(ii) Notice and Default by Pledgor Form Core of Dispute Over Shares of Sesa Sterlite.

5 Jan 2018

The suit was filed by Harinarayan G. Bajaj and others against Reliance Capital Limited and Sesa Sterlite Limited. Plaintiffs borrowed a total of Rs.10...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)