Search Results for "Explanation sale"

3076 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3076 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Multiple Appeals and Cross-Objections Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Challenging Enhanced Compensation for Railway Project Lands. Market Value Determination at Rs.39,20,400 per Acre by Reference Courts Contested as Inadequate by Landowners and Excessive by Railways.

These appeals and cross-objections arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State for the South Central Railway in Mahagaon village, K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Property Declaration Suits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Appellants failed to prove title and possession; no substantial question of law arose under Section 100 CPC.

The judgment pertains to two Regular First Appeals (R.F.A.No.784/2013 and R.F.A.No.785/2013) filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Against Tribunal's Order Requiring Section 72A Approval for Amalgamated Company's Depreciation Claim. The Court Examines Whether Written Down Value of Assets Can Be Adjusted by Adding Unabsorbed Depreciation Without Central Government Approval.

This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 arose from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, concerning assessment ye...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Second Appeals in RERA Delayed Possession Matter. Builder Challenges Appellate Tribunal's Direction to Pay Interest at 10.05% p.a. from February 2014.

These Second Appeals were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay by Runwal Constructions, a registered partnership firm, challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Possession and Title. Court holds that findings of fact based on evidence cannot be interfered with in second appeal under Section 100 CPC unless perverse or based on no evidence.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and respondents (original plaintiffs) over agricultural land. The pl...