Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

1601 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1601 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Stabilisation of Crude Oil Not 'Manufacture' Under Central Excise Act, 1944. The process of stabilising crude oil on process platforms does not amount to manufacture and stabilised crude oil is not excisable goods.

1 Mar 2013

The appellant, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), operates oil wells and process platforms in Mumbai Offshore. The extracted gas-oil mix ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Central Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Applies Separately to Buyer. The right of the buyer to claim refund under Section 11B(2)(e) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is distinct from that of the manufacturer, and the benefit of the second proviso (duty paid under protest) does not extend to the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise duty paid by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission's Order on Maintainability of Settlement Application Under Section 32E of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Holds That Order of Adjudication Is Made on Date of Dispatch, Not Date of Signing

15 Mar 2013

The petitioner, M/s. Vishnu Steels, a manufacturer of excisable goods, challenged an order of the Settlement Commission dismissing its application und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Department's Appeal in Central Excise Refund Case — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Is Mandatory and Unjust Enrichment Applies to Pre-deposit Refunds. The court held that the one-year limitation for refund claims cannot be extended and the claimant must prove no passing of duty burden.

8 Mar 2024

The case involves two connected matters: an appeal by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Thane Rural, against an order of the Customs, Excise ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Case on Residential Complex Construction. Construction of Residential Complex for ITC Limited for Use as Guest House Not Taxable as Commercial or Industrial Construction Service Under Section 65(105)(zzq) of Finance Act, 1994.

4 Jul 2018

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise, Service Tax & Customs) against the order of the Customs, Excise & Service ...

High Court

High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Refund Case — Assessee Passed on Duty Incidence to Customers, Refund Claim Rejected. Section 12B of Central Excise Act, 1944 bars refund if duty burden shifted to others.

26 Aug 2013

The appellant, M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motor Ltd., is engaged in manufacturing passenger utility vehicles and parts thereof, which are excisable under C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Cess Paid Under Protest in Excise Matter — Unjust Enrichment Principle Not Applicable to Cess Under IDR Act. Section 11-B of Central Excise Act Held Inapplicable to Cess Collected Under Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, and Refund Directed with Interest.

26 Apr 2005

The petitioners, Shree Vidhya Paper Mills and Mr. Rameshwarlal Motilal, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking refund of Rs. 10,19,246...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Steel Products Classified as 'Angles, Shapes and Sections' Under Section 4A of Central Excise Act, 1944. Court holds that MRP-based valuation applies only when product is covered by Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and rules thereunder.

27 Sep 2013

The judgment involves three writ appeals filed by M/s Meenakshi Steel Re-rolling Mills and M/s Bhuwalka Steel Industries Limited against the Union of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Service Tax on Onsite Work at Customer's Premises Under Export of Service Rules, 2005. The court held that onsite work at customer's premises abroad qualifies as 'Service Provided from India' under Rule 3(2)(a) of the Export of Service Rules, 2005, and the appellants are entitled to refund of service tax paid.

15 Sep 2014

The case involves appeals by Tech Mahindra Limited and other assessees against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CE...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944. Petitioner entitled to interest from expiry of three months from date of refund application till actual refund.

21 May 2021

The petitioner, Qualcomm India Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, is engaged in providing support services to its ...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)