Search Results for "CPC amendment 1976"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "CPC amendment 1976"

456 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 456 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Condone Delay in Filing Written Statement in Commercial Suit — Mandatory 120-Day Limit Under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Applies. Court holds that the proviso to Order VIII Rule 1 CPC as amended by Section 16 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is a special provision for commercial disputes and overrides the Bombay High Court Original Side Rules, 1980.

10 Jun 2024

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by the defendants (applicants) in a commercial suit before the Bombay High Court, seeking to quash the orde...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision on Impleadment in Admiralty Suit - Commercial Appellate Division's Order Setting Aside Addition of Gulf Petroleum FZC as Defendant Maintained. Maritime Claim for Mis-delivery of Cargo Under Section 4(1)(f) of Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017 Alleged by Bank as Bill of Lading Holder.

23 Sep 2022

The dispute arose from an Admiralty Suit filed by Banque Cantonale de Geneve (Respondent Bank) against the owners of the vessel M.V. Polaris Galaxy (A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Suit for Specific Performance — Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 52 Does Not Bar Transfer Pendente Lite, But Purchaser Must Be Heard Before Final Decree. The court held that a subsequent purchaser of suit property is a necessary and proper party under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, and amendment of plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC to incorporate subsequent events should be allowed.

9 Oct 2014

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a property. The original plaintiffs (appellants) filed Suit No.1241 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Insolvency Notice in Debt Recovery Matter — Debt Recovery Tribunal's Decree Constitutes a Final Judgment Under Section 9(2) of Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act, 1909.

3 Apr 2006

The judgment debtor, Deepak Cochhar and another, filed a notice of motion seeking to set aside Insolvency Notice No. N/72 of 2004 issued by the Insolv...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Auction Dispute, Reversing High Court's Declaration of Auction as Null and Void. Dispute Involved Title to Land Under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and Validity of Auction by Development Authority, with Trial Court Upholding Auction and High Court Overturning It.

5 Aug 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, which allowed a first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Proc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Slum Rehabilitation Tenement Dispute. Court holds that Trial Court erred in not considering balance of convenience and irreparable loss while rejecting injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

29 Sep 2023

The appellants, Fayzan Khan, Devendra Mishra, Firoz Ismail Khan, and Rajesh Kanojiya, filed a suit in the City Civil Court at Dindoshi seeking a decla...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Third Party Impleadment in Property Appeal — Applicants Claiming Adverse Possession Must Be Heard. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC invoked to join parties with independent title claims to ensure complete adjudication.

7 Aug 2012

The present application was filed by two applicants, Khalil Haji Bholumiya Salar and Bilkis Mehboobsaheb Mujawar, seeking impleadment in First Appeal ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Case Due to High Court Exceeding Jurisdiction Under Section 100 CPC. High Court's Reappreciation of Evidence in Second Appeal Quashed as Beyond Scope of Substantial Question of Law.

13 Mar 2019

The present appeal arises from a property dispute between the original plaintiff (respondent) and the original defendants (appellants) concerning the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint for Theft of Documents in Corporate Dispute — Internal Audit Reports and Confidential Documents Not 'Stolen' as They Were Obtained Through Legal Proceedings. The Court held that the ingredients of theft under Section 379 IPC are not satisfied when documents are obtained through legal proceedings and used in bona fide litigation, and continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.

15 May 2019

The appeals arise from a criminal complaint filed by Birla Corporation Limited (the appellant) against Adventz Investments and Holdings Limited and ot...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Execution Decree Holder to Seek Possession Against Third Party Resisters Under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC. The Court held that executing court can decide objections of third parties claiming independent title without requiring a separate suit, and amendment of execution petition is permissible to avoid multiplicity.

18 Dec 2020

The case arises from a specific performance decree obtained by Ayyavoo Udayar (predecessor of appellants) against vendors (respondent nos. 3 and 4) fo...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)