Search Results for "Arbitration Act, 1940"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Arbitration Act, 1940"

462 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 462 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Order Permitting Evidence in Arbitration Challenge. The Court held that the 2019 amendment to Section 34(2)(a) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 is clarificatory and limits evidence to the arbitral record, disallowing additional evidence in Section 34 proceedings except in exceptional circumstances.

19 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from an arbitral award dated 12.03.1998, which was challenged by the respondents through an application under Section 34 of the Arbi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitrator's Interim Order in Copyright License Dispute — Balance of Convenience and Irreparable Loss Considered. The court upheld the arbitrator's order restraining the petitioner from exploiting films and directing delivery of materials, finding no perversity or jurisdictional error under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Jan 2013

The petitioner, Moser Baer Entertainment Limited, filed a petition under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Concerning Forfeiture of Bid Securities in Tender Process. The Petition Questions Whether the Arbitrator Correctly Interpreted Clause 19.6 of the Tender Instructions and the Law on Bank Guarantees.

4 Feb 2015

The dispute arose out of a tender process floated by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited for supply, construction, and comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Municipal Corporation Dispute Over Development Rights. Court holds that Transferable Development Rights (TDR) are not 'goods' under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, and that the Corporation's failure to issue TDR within a reasonable time constitutes breach of contract.

19 Jan 2017

The case involves two appeals arising from an arbitration petition concerning a development agreement between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mum...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Protection to Petitioners in Commercial Arbitration Petition Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Exclusive Rights to Manufacture Ice Cream Under 'Vadilal' Brand in Designated Territories Preserved Pending Arbitration Arising from 1993 Family Settlement.

30 Jun 2026

Shailesh R. Gandhi, Bela S. Gandhi, and Vadilal Dairy International Limited (formerly Super Milk Makers Private Limited) filed a petition under Sectio...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdictional Ruling in Contract Dispute — Novation of Contracts and Non-Assignment of Arbitration Agreement. The court held that the original contracts were novated by subsequent agreements, and the arbitration clause did not pass to the petitioner by merger, thus the tribunal lacked jurisdiction.

20 Jul 2016

The petitioner, DLF Power Limited (now Eastern India Powertech Limited), filed a petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contractor's Appeal in Arbitration Case Upholding Contractual Interest Bar. Pendente Lite Interest Denied as Contract Clause Prohibiting Interest on 'Any Moneys Due' is Valid Under Section 31(7)(a) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and Does Not Violate Section 28 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.

4 Oct 2021

The appeal arose from a dispute between a contractor and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited regarding a construction contract for a boundary wall at a p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Reference to Arbitration in MOFA Suit Involving Non-Signatory Parties. Arbitration Clause Cannot Be Invoked When Suit Seeks Statutory Reliefs Against Developer and Municipal Corporation Under Maharashtra Ownership of Flat Act, 1963.

5 Aug 2013

The petitioner, Shah & Mody Developers, was the defendant in a suit filed by the respondents (Alka Ketan Shah and others) in the City Civil Court, Din...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition under Section 34 of Arbitration Act and Confirms Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute; Appeal Under Section 37 Arises. Single Judge's Order Upholds Award Holding Breach of Contract by Not Supplying DTC Lists

19 Oct 2013

The appeal under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB)/Maharashtra State El...

High Court

APPEAL NO.662 OF 1995

16 Dec 2005

The appeal arises from a judgment and order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 18 January 1996 in Arbitration Petition No.184 of...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)