Search Results for "Appreciation of evidence"

250 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 250 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Case Due to High Court Exceeding Jurisdiction Under Section 100 CPC. High Court's Reappreciation of Evidence in Second Appeal Quashed as Beyond Scope of Substantial Question of Law.

The present appeal arises from a property dispute between the original plaintiff (respondent) and the original defendants (appellants) concerning the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Caste-Based Murder Case — Evidence of Eyewitnesses Found Credible Despite Minor Contradictions. The Court held that the testimony of a single reliable witness is sufficient for conviction, and delay in FIR receipt does not vitiate the case if explained.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals against the conviction of seven accused for the murder of Murugaiyan, a Scheduled Caste man, and for setting his h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence of Bus Driver for Breaking Railway Crossing Gate Under Section 160(2) of Railways Act, 1989. Conviction Upheld but Sentence Reduced to Period Already Undergone Due to Nature of Offence and Passage of Time.

The appellant, Nagaraj, was a driver employed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation. On 3 August 2006, while driving a bus, he hit a railw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Bus Driver in Fatal Accident Case. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts on rash and negligent driving causing death of four persons under Sections 279, 337, and 304-A IPC affirmed.

The appellant, Thangasamy, was convicted by the Trial Court for offences under Sections 279, 337 (3 counts), and 304-A (4 counts) of the Indian Penal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Sentence in Parricide Case: High Court's Reduction to Period Already Undergone Set Aside. Proportionality in Sentencing Reaffirmed for Offence Under Section 304 Part II IPC.

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court which, while upholding the conviction of the respondent Sur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Consignment Agent Dispute — MMTC Ltd. v. Vedanta Ltd. Scope of Interference with Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Limited to Grounds of Public Policy and Patent Illegality.

The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal filed by MMTC Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had upheld the majority arbitral a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Conspiracy. Conviction under Section 302 IPC with Sections 34, 114, 120B IPC confirmed as chain of circumstances complete and motive established.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Vidyalakshmi @ Vidya (A3) and Anand Sabariraj @ Anand (A1) and another (A2) against the common judgment of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Rash Driving Case: Sentences to Run Concurrently. The Court held that under Section 31 CrPC, it is mandatory to specify whether multiple sentences run concurrently or consecutively, and directed concurrent running of sentences under Sections 279 and 304A IPC.

The appellant, Gagan Kumar, was prosecuted and convicted by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jalandhar for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving...