Search Results for "Anil Deshmukh"

535 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 535 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Accused in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Lack of Intent and Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC set aside as death was accidental and not intended.

The appellant, Kundan s/o Girdharisingh Pardeshi, was convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Beed, in Sessions Case No. 28 of 1994 for the off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Domestic Violence Case Due to Settlement Between Parties — Proceedings Under Section 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act Quashed as Complainant and Accused Resolved Differences and Were Living Together.

The applicants, including the husband Abhilash Bhaurao Borkar, his parents, and other relatives, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Part, Acquits Appellants of Rioting and Arson Charges Due to Lack of Evidence of Common Object. Conviction for House Trespass and Hurt Sustained Based on Testimony of Injured Witnesses.

The case arises from an incident on 10.9.1997 where a mob allegedly attacked the house of Sanjay Parode, whose son was arrested for a double murder. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Landowners in MRTP Act Reservation Lapse Case; Reservation Deemed Lapsed as Corporation Failed to Acquire Within Six Months of Purchase Notice. Petitioners Argue That Automatic Lapsing Under Section 127 Is Irreversible and Subsequent Notification Void.

The petitioners, owners of a parcel of land bearing CTS Nos. F/189, F/190, F/191, F/192 and Final Plot No. 646, T.P.S. No. III, Bandra, Mumbai, filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Simple Hurt in Murder Acquittal Case — Appellants Convicted Under Section 323 IPC for Causing Injuries to Complainants.

The case arises from a criminal appeal against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No. 276 of 1993. The appell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape and Murder of Minor in POCSO Case — Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory Sufficient. The court held that the chain of circumstances was complete and the appellant failed to rebut the presumption under Section 29 of POCSO Act.

The appellant, Rahul Gajanan Tumbada, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vasai, for the murder and rape of a 12-year-old girl. The victim...