SECOND APPEAL NO. 148 OF 2016
21 Dec 2016The dispute centered on rights to perform pooja and collect offerings at Goddess Shree Rupa Bhavani Temple in Solapur, registered as a public trust. T...
Search Results for "Aggrieved Parties"
14765 result(s) found
Found 14765 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Against IGST Demand of Rs.1524 Crores on Arbitration Award Damages. Issue Pertains to Whether Damages Paid Under Deemed Decree Constitute Consideration for Taxable Service Under IGST Act, 2017.
30 Apr 2026The dispute centers on a writ petition filed by Tata Sons Private Limited (Tata) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging an intima...
- 69
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Liquidator in Recovery Suit Against Bank for Wrongful Payment After Liquidation — Bank Liable to Pay Fixed Deposit Amount to Liquidator Despite Payment to Company Director After Winding Up.
1 Apr 2015The plaintiff, Gowribidanur Sahakara Sakkare Karkhane Ltd., a co-operative society under liquidation, filed a suit for recovery of money against India...
- 75
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Writ Petition Against Industrial Tribunal Award. Award Directed Reinstatement of Workman Dismissed During Conciliation as Void Under Section 33(1)(a) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
6 Aug 2014The dispute arose from the charge-sheet issued on 28 January 1997 by M/s. Gulf Air to its employee Vinod Malhotra, a Passenger Service Supervisor and ...
- 40
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Termination of Arbitral Proceedings Under ICA Maritime Rules — Rule 20 Time Limit Not Absolute; Delay-Causing Party Cannot Insist on Termination. Arbitral Tribunal's Rejection of Termination Application Upheld as Party Which Caused Delay Through Interlocutory Applications Cannot Rely on Two-Year Limit Under Rule 20(1) of the Maritime Arbitration Rules.
20 Apr 2010The case arose from a charter party executed on 6 November 2006 between Rashtriya Chemical Fertilizers Ltd., a public sector undertaking, and J.S. Oce...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order Refusing to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Commercial Suit — Appellant Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance. The court held that the appellant's failure to appear despite service and the lack of a valid explanation for the delay in filing the application to set aside the decree disentitled it to relief under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
27 Nov 2020The appellant, BVM Finance Private Limited, was the original defendant No.1 in a commercial suit filed by the respondent No.1, Vistra ITCL (India) Ltd...
- 85
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Design Infringement Case, Modifying Consent Decree Due to Typographical Error. The Court held that the High Court erred in dismissing the application under Sections 152 and 153 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as a misunderstanding between parties warranted correction of the Settlement Agreement to reflect the intended trademark 'FX-991ES PLUS'/'FX-991'.
4 Feb 2022The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the Respondent against the Appellant for design infringement and trademark violation regarding scientific...
- 341
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Against DRT Order in Debt Recovery Case — Bank Entitled to Recover Debt Under RDB Act. DRT Has Inherent Power to Reject Frivolous Counterclaim Without Recording Evidence, and High Court Should Not Interfere When Alternative Remedy of Appeal Exists.
18 Dec 2019The case involves two writ petitions arising from proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Fin...
- 149
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Earlier Judgment in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — No Contempt Made Out as Subsequent Transfers Were Not in Breach of Court Orders. The Court held that the earlier judgment did not contain any specific direction restraining transfers, and the respondents had acted under colour of subsequent orders from the DRT and High Court.
13 Dec 2024The Supreme Court dismissed contempt petitions filed by Celir LLP, the successful auction purchaser, alleging wilful disobedience of its earlier judgm...
- 3759
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Lease vs. Licence Dispute — Agreement Dated 1st March 1977 Held to Create Licence, Not Lease. Court Interprets Clauses of Agreement to Determine Intention of Parties, Finding No Transfer of Interest in Property.
28 Feb 2014The dispute in this second appeal arises from a suit filed by the appellant, Prakash Ganesh Lotlikar, against the respondent, Joel Avelino Noronha, se...
- 104
