Search Results for "voidable agreement"

308 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 308 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Injunction Order in Property Dispute Between Co-Owners. Court upholds trial court's discretion to grant temporary injunction restraining alienation of jointly owned properties pending suit for partition and permanent injunction.

The petitioner, Akhil Mansuklal Mehta, and the respondent, Sheetal Deepak Karamchandani, jointly purchased three properties between 1996 and 1998: (1)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Electricity Tariff Dispute — Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Renew Wind Energy (Rajkot) Pvt Ltd. Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) Scheme does not override State Commission's power to determine tariff for wind energy under Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The case involves appeals under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003, by Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited and other distribution licensees against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Quashes Ex-Parte Compromise Decree? – Revision Petitions Challenge Validity Under Order XXIII CPC. Alleged settlement decree in property suits passed without hearing all parties violated procedural safeguards of Order XXIII of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The two Civil Revision Petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India were filed against the common judgment and decree dated 11.12.2024 in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Confirmation of Share Transfer in Wound-Up Company Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Evidence. Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956 requires timely application and proof of bona fide transfer before winding up order.

The appellant, Rathnam P.V., filed an appeal against the order of the Company Judge dismissing his application under Section 536(2) of the Companies A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Consent Decree as Not Maintainable Under Section 96(3) CPC. Appeal Against Consent Terms Recorded Under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC Is Barred by Law.

The case involves an appeal filed by Girja Shankar G. Gupta and others against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 18 Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Over Flat Allotment and Possession. Court upholds concurrent findings that appellants failed to prove title or possession, and that the suit was not barred by limitation or the Cooperative Societies Act.

The case involves a second appeal by original defendant nos. 7 and 8 (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the District Court, Pune, which c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Property Suit — Rejects Plaint Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Suit for Partition and Declaration Not Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action Arose from Denial of Title in 2019.

The case involves a civil revision petition filed by the defendants (petitioners) against an order of the trial court rejecting their application unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Res Judicata Case — Suit Not Barred as Earlier Suit Was Withdrawn Without Liberty to File Fresh Suit. Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Application Rejected as Earlier Suit Was Not Decided on Merits.

The revision application arose from an order of the 7th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur, rejecting the defendant's application under Order ...