Search Results for "tenant's ownership"

722 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 722 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal in Land Reforms Case — Upholds Land Tribunal's Order Granting Occupancy Rights to Tenant. Third Party Trust's Challenge to Tribunal's Order Dismissed as Not Maintainable Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

The appellant, T. Venkateshalu, filed an application in Form No.1 on 06.12.1983 before the Land Tribunal, Hosapete Taluk, claiming occupancy rights in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows FCI Appeal in Property Tax Exemption Case — Holds That Occupier of Central Government Property Is Not Liable Under Article 285(1) When Ownership Vests in Union. Bombay High Court Erred in Relying on Section 146 of MMC Act Without Considering Ownership Status.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) against the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 05.05.2016 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Letter of Intent for Cluster Redevelopment Under DCR 33(9) — No Violation of Tenant Rights Found. Petitioner's claim of illegalities in documents and failure to execute permanent alternate accommodation agreements rejected as premature and lacking merit.

The petitioner, Mr Murtuza Shabbir Tinwala, a resident and tenant in the Bhendi Bazaar Area, filed a Writ Petition challenging the Letter of Intent (L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Petition Challenging Tenant's Purchase Rights Under Bombay Tenancy Act — Landlord's Failure to Cultivate Land Within One Year of Purchase Triggers Tenant's Right to Purchase Under Section 84 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The case involves a dispute under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, regarding agricultural land in Survey No. 341, admeasuring 15 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The case arises from a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the dismissal of their suit for possession of agricultural ...