Search Results for "present demise"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "present demise"

1113 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1113 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that findings of fact recorded by courts below based on evidence cannot be disturbed in appeal under Section 96 CPC unless perverse or contrary to material on record.

18 Jan 2019

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2010 passed by the Senior Ci...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Reverses First Appellate Court's Decree and Restores Trial Court's Dismissal. The Court held that the first appellate court failed to frame proper points for determination under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC, and its judgment was perverse and not based on evidence.

16 Jul 2026

The case involves a property dispute among siblings over ancestral property in Campal, Panaji, Goa. The original plaintiffs (respondents) filed a suit...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Property Declaration Suit — Finds Trial Court Erred in Decreeing Suit Without Proper Consideration of Evidence. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

29 Aug 2013

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 16.01.2006 passed by the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Doddaballapur, in OS No.275/2002 (old No.76/2001), d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint and Impleadment of Parties in Property Dispute — Amendment Sought Before Commencement of Trial Allowed as No Prejudice Caused. Order VI Rule 17 CPC permits liberal amendment before trial; impleadment under Order I Rule 10 CPC allowed for complete adjudication.

1 Aug 2014

The plaintiffs, Sharayu Ramkrishna Mhatre and Anjali Deepak Karnik, filed a suit (Suit No. 1964 of 2012) in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaratio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Nomination for Village Panchayat Election Due to Three Children. Section 14(j-1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Bar Not Applicable as Petitioner Had Only Two Children Born After Specified Date.

7 Dec 2022

The petitioner, Meena Babu Darade, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of her nomination for the election of the village panchayat of Nafa...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Dismissal of Appeal on Limitation Grounds in Land Reforms Case. The Court held that the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal solely on limitation without considering the merits, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

28 Feb 2025

The petitioners, legal representatives of the deceased K. Vijayan, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chall...

High Court

KAHC010102062008_1

10 Aug 2018

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Grandparents in Guardianship Dispute, Sets Aside Appointment of Maternal Aunt as Guardian of Minor Child. The Court held that the welfare of the minor is paramount and that the natural grandparents have a preferential right to guardianship under Section 10 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, unless it is shown that they are unfit.

1 Sep 2014

The case involves a guardianship dispute over a minor girl, Kumari Arya Unawane, born on 10/09/2002. The appellants are the paternal grandparents of t...

High Court

KAHC010480352008_1

10 Aug 2018

...

High Court

High Court Quashes Revenue Orders Dismissing Tenancy Application Under Section 70B of Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948, Due to Lack of Hearing and Misplaced Reliance on Deletion of Section 32(O). The Court Holds That the Application Must Be Decided on Merits Independent of the Deleted Provision, as No Correlation Exists Between Sections 70B and 32(O).

27 Jan 2026

The dispute arose from an application filed under Sections 70B and 70NB of the Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948, by the petitioners, cl...

21 22 23 24 25

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)