Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Grandparents in Guardianship Dispute, Sets Aside Appointment of Maternal Aunt as Guardian of Minor Child. The Court held that the welfare of the minor is paramount and that the natural grandparents have a preferential right to guardianship under Section 10 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, unless it is shown that they are unfit.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 84
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a guardianship dispute over a minor girl, Kumari Arya Unawane, born on 10/09/2002. The appellants are the paternal grandparents of the minor. Their son (the minor's father) died on 20/04/2005. The minor's mother, Pallavi, died in a road accident on 20/09/2009. After the mother's death, the minor resided with the respondent, who is the maternal aunt (real sister of the mother). The respondent filed an application under Section 10 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, seeking appointment as guardian of the minor. The learned District Judge-1, Malegaon, allowed the application on 24/06/2013, appointing the respondent as guardian. The appellants challenged this order in the High Court. The High Court noted that the appellants are the natural grandparents and have a preferential right to guardianship. The court observed that the welfare of the minor is paramount and that there was no evidence to show that the grandparents were unfit. The court also noted that the respondent had not obtained any order for custody from any competent court. The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order, and directed that the minor be handed over to the appellants. The court further directed that the appellants shall not alienate any property of the minor without court permission.

Headnote

A) Guardianship - Welfare of Minor - Preferential Right of Natural Guardians - Section 10, Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - The court considered whether the maternal aunt should be appointed guardian of the minor child over the paternal grandparents. The court held that the welfare of the minor is paramount and that natural grandparents have a preferential right to guardianship unless shown to be unfit. The court set aside the appointment of the maternal aunt and directed that the minor be handed over to the grandparents. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appointment of the respondent (maternal aunt) as guardian of the minor child under Section 10 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, was proper, considering the appellants (paternal grandparents) are the natural guardians and have a preferential right to custody.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The order and judgment dated 24/06/2013 passed by the learned District Judge-1, Malegaon, is set aside. The respondent is directed to hand over the custody of the minor Kumari Arya Unawane to the appellants within four weeks. The appellants shall not alienate any property of the minor without permission of the court.

Law Points

  • Welfare of minor is paramount
  • Natural guardians have preferential right
  • Grandparents' right to custody
  • Section 10 Guardians and Wards Act
  • 1890
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (09) 81

First Appeal No.244 of 2014

2014-09-01

R.D. Dhanuka, J.

Mr K.V. Saste for appellants, Ms Jyoti Pandey for respondent

Mr Sitaram Bhagaji Unawane and Sau Sindhu Sitaram Unawane

Dr Pradnya Vikram Vaidya

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order appointing maternal aunt as guardian of minor child under Section 10 of Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.

Remedy Sought

Appellants (paternal grandparents) sought setting aside of the order appointing respondent as guardian and custody of the minor.

Filing Reason

The respondent (maternal aunt) filed an application for guardianship of the minor after the death of the minor's parents. The appellants, as natural grandparents, opposed the application.

Previous Decisions

The learned District Judge-1, Malegaon, allowed the respondent's application on 24/06/2013, appointing her as guardian.

Issues

Whether the appointment of the respondent as guardian of the minor was proper given the appellants' preferential right as natural grandparents. Whether the welfare of the minor was considered in the impugned order.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that they are the natural grandparents and have a preferential right to guardianship. They also contended that the respondent had no legal right to custody. Respondent argued that she has been taking care of the minor since the mother's death and that the minor is well-settled with her.

Ratio Decidendi

The welfare of the minor is paramount. Natural grandparents have a preferential right to guardianship over other relatives unless they are shown to be unfit. The respondent, being a maternal aunt, cannot claim guardianship over the natural grandparents without establishing that the grandparents are unfit or that it is not in the minor's welfare to be with them.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal is directed against the order and Judgment dated 24/06/2013 passed by the learned District Judge1, Malegaon allowing the application filed by the respondent who is real maternal aunt of the minor child inter alia praying for her appointment as guardian of the minor Kumari Arya Unawane under Section 10 of Guardianship and Wards Act, 1890. The appellants are the natural grand parents of the minor Kumari Aarya Unawane.

Procedural History

The respondent filed an application under Section 10 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, before the District Judge-1, Malegaon, which was allowed on 24/06/2013. The appellants filed the present appeal against that order. The appeal was admitted and heard finally by consent of parties.

Acts & Sections

  • Guardians and Wards Act, 1890: Section 10
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Grandparents in Guardianship Dispute, Sets Aside Appointment of Maternal Aunt as Guardian of Minor Child. The Court held that the welfare of the minor is paramount and that the natural grandparents have a preferenti...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Divorce Petition and Partially Allows Wife's Maintenance Appeal in Hindu Marriage Dispute. Husband fails to prove desertion for divorce under Section 13(1-A)(ii) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; wife granted enhanced...