Search Results for "penalty confirmation"

435 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 435 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court hears appeal against CESTAT order upholding duty demand and confiscation of diamonds due to shortage and non-compliance with export obligations — substantial questions raised on interpretation of Notification No. 177/94-Cus and para 8.78B of Handbook of Procedures.

The appellant, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting gold jewellery studded with diamonds at its unit in the Santacruz Electronics...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes DGFT Order Cancelling Advance Authorisation and EPCG Licences for Optical Fibre Manufacturer — Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Application of Mind. Petitioner's licences restored as cancellation was based on irrelevant considerations and without proper hearing.

The petitioner, Ashwini Ashish Dighe, proprietor of Sunteck Telecommunications, a manufacturer of optical fibres, filed a writ petition challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Depository Against Arbitral Award for Lost Shares Due to Third-Party Fraud. Court Holds That Depository Not Liable Absent Negligence or Breach of Contract Under Section 12(1-A) of SEBI Act, 1992.

The case involves an appeal by Central Depository Services (India) Ltd. (CDSL) against a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 01/12/2025, which up...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Reviews Convictions and Death Sentence in Sexual Abuse of Mentally Challenged Girls at Children’s Home. Prosecution Established Charges Under IPC and Juvenile Justice Act for Rape, Unnatural Offences, and Assault Against Inmates, Leading to Appeals and Confirmation of Death Penalty.

The case arose from a suo motu public interest litigation initiated by the Bombay High Court after a newspaper report exposed the poor conditions in c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Customs Duty Exemption Case for Hospital Equipment. Condition of Free Treatment Under Notification No.64/1988-Cus. Must Be Strictly Complied With for Exemption.

The applicant, M/s National Heart Centre & Hypertension Clinic, through its Director Dr. Shashank Bhalchandra Subhedar, imported a Computerized Stress...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Sentence Modification in Court-Martial Case. General Court Martial Composition Violated Army Rules, 1954, Rule 40(2) and Rule 102, but Armed Forces Tribunal's Sentencing Discretion Under Section 71(e) of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 Upheld.

The dispute arose from disciplinary proceedings against a retired Lieutenant General of the Indian Army, initiated after an anonymous complaint in 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Termination of Junior Officers in NMDC for Violation of Natural Justice. Termination Order Set Aside as Employer Failed to Provide Opportunity of Hearing Before Dismissal.

The case involves five writ petitions filed by Junior Officers (Mines) of National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. (NMDC), a Government of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Petitions Challenging SEBI's Show Cause Notices to Auditors of Satyam Computers. Question of SEBI's Jurisdiction under Sections 11, 11B, and 11(4) of SEBI Act Raised in Wake of Satyam Fraud Disclosure.

The matter arose from writ petitions filed by Price Waterhouse & Co. and other chartered accountant firms along with individual partners challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds award of damages for delay in handing over possession and interest under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, BASF India Ltd., entered into an agreement dated 5.3.2002 with the respondent, Landcom Properties Pvt. Ltd., under which the responden...