Search Results for "four year limitation"

2032 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2032 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates First Appeal Under Section 96 CPC in a Land Title and Possession Dispute Between Two Educational Trusts. The Appeal Arises from Dismissal of Suit for Declaration, Permanent and Mandatory Injunction by the Trial Court.

The dispute involved two educational trusts, the Golden Valley Educational Trust (plaintiff) and the Vokkaligara Sangha (defendant), over land granted...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeals in Property Dispute. Court upholds concurrent findings that appellant failed to prove title and possession over suit properties, finding no substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Basavaraj Basavanneppa Pattan, filed six second appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions Challenging Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Property Dispute. Court holds that appointment of arbitrator by consent of parties is valid and cannot be challenged under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment pertains to two arbitration petitions filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioners in Arbitratio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7370 OF 2026

The present Civil Appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural properties based on a Will dated 20.04.2018, allegedly execut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty on Cancelled Development Agreement Under Section 47(c)(5) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner entitled to refund as transaction was cancelled before possession and within two years, not covered by Section 48 proviso.

The Petitioner, M/s. Satyam Construction, entered into a Development Agreement on 2 June 2011 with Shri Rajiv Ghule and others for development of land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Legal Heirs of Borrower. Court Holds That Legal Heirs Are Bound by Mortgage and Cannot Challenge Section 13(2) Notice After Delay and Without Availing Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act.

The petitioners, legal heirs of Smt. Sudha Avdhut Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the proceedings initiated by the Central Bank of India unde...