Search Results for "false description"

1199 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1199 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Appellants for Gang Rape Under Section 376D IPC — Sentence of 20 Years Rigorous Imprisonment Confirmed. Testimony of Minor Victim Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence, Despite Minor Inconsistencies.

The appellants, Vinod Baku Jadhao and Sunil Raju Jadhao, were convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha for the offence of gang rape under Section 376D o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Challenge to Section 41-A Notice Issued in Uttar Pradesh Fake News FIR; Twitter India Employee Contends No Control Over Platform and No Cause of Action in Karnataka.

The petitioner, Manish Maheshwari, an employee of Twitter Communications India Private Limited (TCIPL), holding the designation of Managing Director b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Murder of Four Family Members in Brutal Robbery-Murder Case. Court Upholds Conviction Under Sections 302, 392, 449, 460, 201 IPC for Killing Two Adults and Two Children in Their Flat.

The case arises from a brutal murder of four members of a family in their flat in Pune. The accused, Bhagwat Bajirao Kale, was a labourer working at a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Confirmation of Death Penalty and Appeals in Family Murders Case. Charges under Section 302 IPC for Killing Wife and Three Children Based on Circumstantial Evidence.

The Confirmation Case No.3 of 2005 and Criminal Appeal No.518 of 2005 arose out of the conviction of the accused Ajitsingh Harnamsingh Gujral by the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Defendant Guilty of Contempt for Willful Disobedience of Injunction in Copyright and Passing Off Case. Defendant's Continued Use of Deceptively Similar Trade Dress Despite Court Order Constitutes Contempt Under Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC.

The Plaintiff, Cargil India Private Limited, a subsidiary of Cargil Inc., is engaged in the business of edible oils and holds copyright in the packagi...