Search Results for "conciliation under CPC"

512 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 512 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Under Section 37(1)(b) of Arbitration Act Against Rejection of Interim Injunction in Hotel Management Dispute. Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Respondents from Interfering with Appellant's Management of Hotel Pending Arbitration.

The appellant, Royal Orchid Associated Hotels Private Limited, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Section 37(1)(b) of the Arbitration and Concil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Under Section 37 Against Interim Order Under Section 9 in Property Development Arbitration. The Impugned Order Granted Conditional Relief Including Injunction and Appointment of Receiver Pending Arbitration.

The appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent challenged an order passed by a le...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contractor/Developer's Challenge to Majority Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute. Court upholds award of Rs.7,35,000, Rs.10,80,000, interest, and costs under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, M/s. Raviuday Construction Co., a partnership firm, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 15 May 2012 passed by a three-member ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Considers Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders Dismissing Interlocutory Applications. The Petitions, Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, Seek Certiorari Against Orders Dated 18.06.2025 in Various KID Proceedings.

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, heard and reserved judgment on a batch of writ petitions filed by BDK Valves Private Limited, a company in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Sets Aside MSME Facilitation Council Award for Lack of Jurisdiction — BSNL Not Liable for Interest Under MSMED Act as Council Had No Territorial Authority Over Dispute Arising from Contract with Chennai Seat of Arbitration.

The petitioner, M/s. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interlocutory Order as Not Maintainable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Order Rejecting Permission to File Fresh Valuation Report Is Not an Interim Award and Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 34.

The dispute arises from a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) dated 22.12.2003 between Dilip Timblo (appellant) and Prashant Timblo (respondent). The appel...