Search Results for "arbitrators jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "arbitrators jurisdiction"

795 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 795 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Rejection of Section 9 Petition — Interim Relief Granted to Foreign Investor in Shareholder Dispute. Court holds that the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction to decide on interim measures does not preclude the court from granting interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, especially when the tribunal is not yet constituted.

29 Jan 2021

The Appellant, Aniket SA Investments LLC, a foreign investor and shareholder in Respondent No. 1 (Janapriya Engineers Syndicate Private Limited), file...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Extension of Time for Arbitration in Infrastructure Dispute Under Section 29-A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Grants Six Months Extension for Completion of Pending Arbitration Proceedings with Consent of Both Parties.

22 Jan 2024

The petitioner, K.I.P.L. Vistacore Infra Projects J.V., filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Court holds that review cannot be used as an appeal and that the arbitrator's appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not subject to review on merits.

8 Jun 2016

The petitioners, Roptonal Ltd (formerly Indian Film Company (Cyprus) Ltd) and Viacom 18 Media Pvt. Ltd., filed a review petition in the Bombay High Co...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Broker's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Client Dispute Over Delay Paying Charges. Unilateral Charging of 2% Daily Interest Without Specific Agreement or Proof of Loss Held Unconscionable and Not Enforceable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

7 Mar 2012

The case involves a dispute between Sharekhan Limited, a trading member/broker of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), and Nita Thakkar, a client. The bro...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Upholds Execution of Decree Based on Arbitration Award, Declares Eviction Decree Void Under Rent Control Act. Tenant's Objection to Award Validity Precluded After Decree, But Decree Contravening Section 13(1) of Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952 Held Nullity.

16 Oct 1968

The dispute arose from a landlord-tenant relationship concerning a building in Delhi. The landlord's son resided on the first floor while the tenants ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute — Restores Arbitral Award for Compensation for Unproductive Use of Machinery. Court Holds That High Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting Its Own View.

18 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s. Dyna Technologies Pvt. Ltd. against the judgment of the Madras High Court, which had set aside an a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Foreign Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act — Foreign Award Not Challengeable Under Domestic Provisions. The court held that a foreign award cannot be challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and mere denial of the agreement does not convert it into a domestic award.

28 Feb 2005

The appeal arose from an order of a single judge dismissing the appellant's petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Trust and Coverage Dispute. Majority Award Upheld as Not Patently Illegal Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Jan 2013

The petitioner, The New India Insurance Company Limited, challenged an arbitral award dated 27 July 2009 passed by a three-member Arbitral Tribunal un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Electricity Transmission Contract Dispute. Court upholds majority award granting escalation costs and interest to contractor for delays caused by principal.

8 Nov 2019

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd., challenged a majority arbitral award dated 6 January 2017 under Section 34 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Arbitral Award in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Award of Damages for Unauthorized Trades and Deficiency in Service. The Court held that the arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and negligence were not perverse and did not warrant interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Dec 2020

The case involves appeals filed by IFIN Commodities Limited (the appellant-broker) against an arbitral award that had been upheld by a Single Judge un...

21 22 23 24 25

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)