WRIT PETITION NO. 7985 OF 2005.
25 Jan 2006The petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged an order of the Second Labour Court, Thane, which allowed an applicatio...
Search Results for "Tribunal error"
4636 result(s) found
Found 4636 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Teacher Terminated Without Inquiry. Termination of Teacher Without Valid Departmental Inquiry Under Section 5 of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977 is Illegal and Reinstatement with Backwages is Justified.
6 Oct 2023The Petitioner-Management, a trust running schools, terminated Respondent No.1, an Assistant Teacher, on 10 January 2011. The termination was challeng...
- 35
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Reference on Interpretation of Section 9A CPC (Maharashtra Amendment) — Jurisdiction Includes Limitation. The court examines whether the expression 'jurisdiction of the Court to entertain such suit' under Section 9A includes the issue of limitation, doubting the correctness of Foreshore Cooperative Housing Society v. Praveen D. Desai.
4 Oct 2019The Supreme Court considered a reference made by a Division Bench doubting the correctness of the decision in Foreshore Cooperative Housing Society Li...
- 299
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Employee's Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Reversal of Reinstatement Order. Industrial Court Erred in Permitting De Novo Enquiry Without Employer Reserving Right in Written Statement as Per Supreme Court Precedent.
8 Aug 2019This writ petition arises from an industrial dispute where the petitioner-employee, a sweeper with the Nanded-Waghala City Municipal Corporation, chal...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Award Extending Benefits to Transferred Workmen — Protection of Service Conditions Upheld Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court held that workmen transferred from erstwhile Tomco and Lakme factories were entitled to extension of benefits under prior awards and settlements, and the Industrial Court's award was within the scope of the reference.
16 Jul 2014The petitioner, Hindustan Unilever Ltd. Research Centre And FCU / Development Centre, challenged an award of the Industrial Court dated 30 November 20...
- 157
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Whether Interest is Leviable on Additional Duty of Customs and Settlement Commission's Power to Rectify Errors. The Court Scrutinised the Legality of Imposing Interest on Counter Veiling Duty Where Modvat Credit Was Available and Considered Whether Tribunals Have Inherent Jurisdiction to Correct Accidental Mistakes Under Section 127H of Customs Act, 1962.
27 Apr 2005The matter arose from a writ petition filed by a public limited company engaged in manufacturing automotive furnishing fabrics, challenging the order ...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Appoint Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Unpaid Invoices Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Respondent's Limitation Objection Rejected as Debt Acknowledged Within Limitation Period, Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator.
8 Jun 2026The petitioner, Oil Field Instrumentation India Pvt Ltd, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking ap...
- 199
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRAT's Pre-Deposit Order Under SARFAESI Act. Pre-deposit of 30% of Amount Due Under Section 18(1) of SARFAESI Act is Mandatory and DRAT Has No Discretion to Waive It.
15 Nov 2011The petitioner, Shree Vindhya Paper Mills Ltd., challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 4 November 2011, which requir...
- 75
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Management Appeals in Double Overtime Allowance Case for Supervisors. Supervisors Not Entitled to Double Over Time Allowance Under Service Rules.
15 Dec 2023The case pertains to a dispute over the entitlement of Double Over Time Allowance to employees working as Supervisors in the Security Printing & Minti...
- 305
High Court
Bombay High Court Decides Arbitration Petition Challenging Award in Advertising Rights Tender Dispute. Court Examines Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
4 Dec 2025The arbitration petition arose from a tender floated by Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) on 9 November 2018 for allotment...
