Search Results for "Section 320 IPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Section 320 IPC"

303 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 303 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Charge Sheets Against Cooperative Society and Chairman in CBI Bank Fraud Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Section 155(2) of Companies Act Renders Prosecution Invalid. The court held that prosecution for offences under the Companies Act requires prior sanction under Section 155(2), and in its absence, the charge sheets are liable to be quashed.

20 Feb 2019

The petitioners, M/s. Ghataprabha Sahakari Sakkare Karkhane Niyamit (a cooperative society) and its Chairman, Lakhan Laxmanrao Jarkiholi, filed two wr...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder Under Section 307 IPC — Stabbing with Swiss Army Knife During Holi Celebration Constitutes Attempt to Murder. The court held that the nature of the injury and the weapon used clearly indicate an intention to cause death, and the conviction under Section 307 IPC was justified.

31 Aug 2012

The appellant, Chandan Vagurmekar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Panaji, for the offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Son for Murder of Father's Second Wife Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Motive, last seen, recovery of blood-stained shoes, and false explanation established guilt under Section 302 IPC.

31 Aug 2010

The case involves the murder of Nagavva @ Bismilla, the second wife of accused no.2 Yusuf Ismail Shaikh. Accused no.1 Badesaab Yusuf Shaikh, son of ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Robbery and Grievous Hurt with Deadly Weapon in Beedi Shop Incident. Appellant's conviction under Sections 394 and 397 IPC confirmed based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.

29 Aug 2006

The appellant, Rajan Ramchandra Haldankar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.638 of 1996 for offen...

Supreme Court

GULFISHA FATIMA

1 Jan 1970

The present appeals before the Supreme Court arise from a common judgment of the High Court of Delhi which affirmed the rejection of bail applications...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Quashing FIR in Non-Compoundable Offences Without Consent of Injured Complainant. Settlement with One Victim Insufficient to Quash Proceedings Where Original Complainant and Injured Party Opposed Compromise.

4 Mar 2024

The appellant, Anil Mishra, lodged an FIR on 07.08.1999 alleging that he and Respondent No. 5 were beaten and injured by accused persons wielding fire...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes PMLA Proceedings Against Accused in Seva Bank Loan Fraud Case — Lack of Scheduled Offence and Non-Application of Mind in ECIR Registration. The court held that the ECIR was registered solely on the basis of FIR No.163/2018 involving Section 420 IPC, but the subsequent FIRs (525/2021, 526/2021, 527/2021) which included other scheduled offences were not considered, and the proceeds of crime were not properly identified, rendering the PMLA proceedings unsustainable.

29 Aug 2024

The judgment concerns multiple writ petitions filed by individuals accused in connection with alleged loan fraud involving Seva Vikas Co-operative Ban...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Charges Against Accused in Securities Scam Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inordinate Delay. Petitioners were directors of a company accused of cheating and criminal conspiracy in securities transactions, but the court found no prima facie case and held that the 25-year delay violated their right to speedy trial.

22 Aug 2023

The petitioners, Dhyan Investments & Trading Company Ltd. and Tushar Sarda, were accused nos. 3 and 4 in Special Case No.2 of 1998 pending before the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused No.4 in UAP Act Case on Grounds of Parity and Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy. Petitioner-accused No.4, not named in FIR, granted bail as co-accused already released and no material showing his involvement in conspiracy under Sections 13, 16, 18, 20, 38 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

10 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Riyaz Ahamed Sayeedi, accused No.4, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail ...

High Court

SPECIAL CASE NO. 3 OF 2001

6 Jan 2015

The Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992, presided over by Justice Roshan Dalvi, heard Special Case No. ...

21 22 23 24 25

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)