Search Results for "Prevention of Corruption Act"

461 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 461 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Public Servants in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 31.10.2001 passed by the Special Judge, Thane, in Special Case No.6 of 1992, ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti-Corruption Bureau, Buldhana, appealed against the judgment of the Special Judge, Buldhana, acquitting the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Revision Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Valid Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Sanction for Prosecution of Public Servants Must Show Application of Mind, Absence Renders Trial Void.

The case involves a criminal writ petition filed by the State of Maharashtra challenging the acquittal of three respondents, Sanjivkumar Bapurao Wadik...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Police Patil Under Prevention of Corruption Act — Police Patil Not a Public Servant Under Section 2(c) of the Act. Petitioner appointed under Maharashtra Village Police Act, 1967 held not to be a public servant within meaning of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Atul Ramdas Dabare, was appointed as a Police Patil under the Maharashtra Village Police Act, 1967. An FIR was registered against him ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Back Wages to Employee Acquitted in Corruption Case — Denial Must Be Reasoned. Reinstatement After Acquittal Does Not Automatically Entitle Back Wages; Employer Must Consider Nature of Acquittal and Conduct Under Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution.

The petitioner, Ramchandra Bapusaheb Desai, was employed as a Junior Engineer with the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Subhash s/o Narayanraoji Rathod, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, in Special Case No. 4/1997 for offences under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dattatraya Rajaram Thaokar, a retired government servant, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No. 25/1991 for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Tax Collector in Bribery Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. Demand of Illegal Gratification for Issuing Tax Demand Notice Proved Through Trap and Recovery of Tainted Currency Notes.

The appellant, Dayaram s/o Balram Kuthe, was a Tax Collector with the Nagpur Municipal Corporation. The complainant, Dharamraj Natthuji Madankar, cons...