Bombay High Court Quashes Corruption Proceedings Against Retired Engineer in Gosikhurd Project Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Renders Prosecution Invalid. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is mandatory for prosecution of public servant; proceedings quashed under Section 482 CrPC for want of valid sanction.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Sanjay Laxman Kholapurkar, a retired Superintending Engineer of the Irrigation Department, Government of Maharashtra, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of criminal proceedings in Special Case No.23/2016 arising out of Crime No.3176/2016 registered with Sadar Police Station, Nagpur for offences under Sections 13(1)(c), 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Sections 420, 120-B, 109, 465, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The applicant was arrayed as accused no.4 in the charge-sheet. The facts reveal that the applicant served as Superintending Engineer and was posted as Administrator, Command Area Development Authority, Nagpur in 2003. In 2013, he took voluntary retirement. Before retirement, he was attached to Gosikhurd Project and was in-charge of Dam Construction, Rehabilitation and Right Bank Canal in Bhandara and Chandrapur Districts. The prosecution alleged that during his tenure, irregularities were committed. The applicant contended that no valid sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act was obtained before filing the charge-sheet, which is mandatory for prosecution of a public servant. The court, after hearing the parties, found that the charge-sheet was filed without obtaining the requisite sanction, rendering the proceedings invalid. Consequently, the court allowed the application and quashed the criminal proceedings against the applicant.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Quashing of Proceedings - Section 482 CrPC - Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Applicant, a retired Superintending Engineer, was accused of corruption and cheating in Gosikhurd Project - Court held that no valid sanction was obtained before filing charge-sheet, making proceedings invalid - Quashed the criminal proceedings against the applicant (Paras 2-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether criminal proceedings against a retired public servant can be quashed for want of valid sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, when the alleged offences were committed during his service.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and quashed the criminal proceedings in Special Case No.23/2016 arising out of Crime No.3176/2016 against the applicant.

Law Points

  • Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act
  • 1988 is mandatory for prosecution of public servant
  • Quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC for want of valid sanction
  • Proceedings invalid ab initio without sanction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (03) 175

Criminal Application (APL) No.716 of 2016

2017-03-10

B.R. Gavai, Kum. Indira Jain

Shri S.P. Dharmadhikari, Sr. Adv. with Shri Shyam Dewani, Adv. for the Applicant; Shri S.M. Ukey, Additional Public Prosecutor for the Non-Applicant/State

Sanjay s/o Laxman Kholapurkar

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC and Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India seeking quashing of criminal proceedings in a corruption case.

Remedy Sought

Applicant (accused no.4) sought quashing of Special Case No.23/2016 arising out of Crime No.3176/2016 for offences under Prevention of Corruption Act and Indian Penal Code.

Filing Reason

Applicant contended that no valid sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act was obtained before filing charge-sheet, making proceedings invalid.

Issues

Whether criminal proceedings against a retired public servant can be quashed for want of valid sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988?

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that no sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act was obtained before filing charge-sheet, which is mandatory for prosecution of a public servant. State opposed the application.

Ratio Decidendi

Sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is a mandatory prerequisite for prosecution of a public servant. Filing of charge-sheet without obtaining such sanction renders the criminal proceedings invalid and liable to be quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Judgment Excerpts

By this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, applicant seeks quashing of the criminal proceedings in Special Case No.23/2016 arising out of Crime No.3176/2016... Applicant is arrayed as accused no.4 in the charge-sheet.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Criminal Application (APL) No.716 of 2016 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking quashing of Special Case No.23/2016 arising out of Crime No.3176/2016. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 10th March 2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988: 13(1)(c), 13(1)(d), 13(2), 19
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 420, 120-B, 109, 465, 467, 468, 471
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Corruption Proceedings Against Retired Engineer in Gosikhurd Project Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Renders Prosecution Invalid. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Co...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Partly Allows Union of India's Petition Against Tribunal's Grant of Compassionate Allowance — Disciplinary Authority Must Consider Compassionate Allowance Under Rule 41(1) of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 When Imposing Removal Pena...