SPECIAL CASE NO. 3 OF 2001
6 Jan 2015The Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992, presided over by Justice Roshan Dalvi, heard Special Case No. ...
Search Results for "Mumbai head office"
2144 result(s) found
Found 2144 result(s)
High Court
- 61
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Police Recruitment Selection Process — No Merit in Allegations of Irregularities in Physical Endurance Test and Viva Voce. Court Held That Selection Process Was Conducted Fairly and in Accordance with Rules, and Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Malafides or Violation of Principles of Natural Justice.
28 Sep 2017The petitioner, Sushant Suresh Salvi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the selection process for the p...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee's Adverse Orders in Municipal Election Disqualification Cases. Court holds that the Scrutiny Committee must follow principles of natural justice and provide opportunity of hearing before declaring caste certificates invalid.
30 Nov -0001The judgment involves two writ petitions filed by Sudha Shambhunath Singh and Murji Kanji Patel challenging orders of the District Caste Certificate S...
- 72
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Subcontract Dispute. Petition filed by main contractor against subcontractor's award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
21 Mar 2013Patel Engineering Co. Ltd (PEC) challenged an arbitral award dated 25 January 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in t...
- 50
High Court
- 306
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Guarantors — Personal Guarantee Not a 'Right or Interest in Property' Under Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Guarantors Cannot Challenge Possession Notice Before Debt Recovery Tribunal Under SARFAESI; Remedy Lies Under RDDB Act, 1993.
10 Mar 2017The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Mahindra Chandrasen and Sharad Chandrasen (petitioners) against Union Bank of India and other respon...
- 79
High Court
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Suit for Specific Performance Against Cooperative Housing Society and Members Due to Lack of Privity and Authority. The court held that a cooperative society cannot bind its members to a development agreement without their consent, and the suit was not maintainable.
30 Nov -0001The plaintiff, Vardhman Developers Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement against Borla Co-operative Housing Society L...
- 115
High Court
- 67
