Search Results for "International commercial arbitration"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "International commercial arbitration"

649 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 649 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Application in Arbitration Dispute Over Barge Sale Agreement. Jurisdictional Objection Must Be Decided Before Granting or Refusing Interim Relief Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Mar 2016

The appellant, M/s. Prince Marine Transport Services Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Development Agreement Dispute Between Cooperative Housing Society and Developer. Court Upholds Award on Termination of Agreement and Refund of Deposit but Sets Aside Directions for Possession and Appointment of Receiver.

7 Jan 2020

The judgment arises from two arbitration petitions and a notice of motion filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to ISP in Section 9 Arbitration Application, Restraining OTT Platform from Suspending Internet Services to 22,000+ Subscribers. Court holds that MOU creates binding obligations and balance of convenience favors continuity of services pending arbitration.

2 Dec 2022

The applicant, World Phone Internet Services Pvt. Ltd. (WPISPL), a Delhi-based Class A Unified License ISP, filed an application under Section 9 of th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Extension of Arbitrator's Mandate Under Section 29A(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Even After Award Rendered Beyond Statutory Time Limit -- Court Reverses High Court Decision Setting Aside Award

3 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's orders, holding that a court can entertain an application under Section 29A(5) of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Chamber Summons Seeking to Set Aside Consent Terms in Arbitration Petition — Consent Terms Recorded by Court Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

22 Dec 2015

The applicants, original respondent nos.1 to 5, filed Chamber Summons No.905 of 2013 in Letters Patent Petition No.226 of 2013 and Arbitration Petitio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Arbitrator's Findings on Loan vs. Capital Contribution and Rejection of Counterclaim as Not Maintainable. The court held that the arbitrator's findings were based on evidence and not perverse, and the challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 failed.

23 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Shekhar Appu Shetty, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award on Termination and Repudiation of Master Asset Purchase Agreement. Arbitrator's Finding of Repudiation by Purchaser and Direction for Refund of Consideration under MAPA Considered.

10 May 2013

The dispute arose from a Master Asset Purchase Agreement (MAPA) dated 31st March 2005 between Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. as purchaser and V Hote...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitration Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Validity of Award Based on Partnership Deed and Evidence. Court Held That Arbitrator's Findings on Dissolution and Accounts Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

10 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Vinod Kumar Saraf, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Awards in Share Subscription Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Findings of Fact Are Not Re-Examinable. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's findings on breach of representations and warranties in Share Subscription Agreement and Shareholders Agreement, holding that the tribunal's interpretation of contractual terms and assessment of evidence cannot be reappraised under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

5 May 2017

The present appeal arises from the dismissal of two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by a learned Single Judg...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Time Extension Dispute — Holds Application Under Section 29A(5) Can Be Filed After Expiry of Arbitral Tribunal's Mandate. The court resolved the conflict among High Courts by interpreting Section 29A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to permit post-expiry extension applications, overruling the Calcutta High Court's decision in Rohan Builders.

1 Jan 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a batch of civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions, addressed a significant conflict among High Courts regar...

21 22 23 24 25

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)