Search Results for "Deemed withdrawal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Deemed withdrawal"

1050 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1050 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Case Involving Trademark Ownership Dispute. The Court upheld NCLAT's finding that NCLT's declaration of trademark ownership impermissibly modified the approved Resolution Plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

28 Apr 2025

The appeal arose from a dispute over trademark ownership in the context of a corporate insolvency resolution process under the Insolvency and Bankrupt...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Teacher Seniority Dispute — Upholds Trial Court's Finding That Appellant Was Not Entitled to Seniority Over Respondent. The court held that seniority is determined by the date of approval of appointment by the Education Department, not by the date of initial appointment.

10 Apr 2015

The case involves a dispute over seniority between two teachers, Smt. Nanda Haldankar (appellant) and Smt. Nalini Kulkarni (respondent, since deceased...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding.

13 Jul 2026

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes ULC Act Demand for Entire Land Area Including Vacant Land — Demand Must Be Limited to Built-Up Area Only. The court held that under the repealed Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, a demand for payment cannot include vacant land as per the Section 20 Exemption Order Schedule.

9 Aug 2023

The petitioners challenged a demand of Rs 6,09,66,477 raised by the District Collector and Competent Authority under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regul...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Golf Course Construction in CRZ Area. Court holds that the subject land is not within CRZ limits based on the approved CRZ map, and the petitioner failed to establish any illegality in the permissions granted.

11 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Sunil Sureshchandra Agarwal, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High ...

High Court

KAHC010364002010_1

11 Jul 2014

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Suit Under Article 131 for Lack of Cause of Action and Suppression of Material Facts. The suit challenging the validity of notifications under the DSPE Act was held not maintainable as the dispute was not between the State and the Union but between the State and its own officers.

10 Jul 2024

The State of West Bengal filed a suit under Article 131 of the Constitution of India against the Union of India, challenging the validity of notificat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State of Goa's Appeal in Forest Land Ownership Dispute — Names of Private Individuals Ordered to be Deleted from Survey Entry. The Court held that the unappealed finding of non-ownership and the 1951 Gazette Notification established the property as forest land belonging to the Forest Department.

6 Mar 2020

The State of Goa appealed against the judgment of the High Court of Bombay at Goa which affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the State's countercla...

High Court

KAHC010023912010_1

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Arrest of Vessel for Maritime Claim Under Admiralty Act, 2017 — Bunker Supply Constitutes Necessaries. The court held that supply of bunkers to a vessel is a maritime claim under Section 4(1)(l) of the Admiralty (Jurisdiction & Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017, and granted conditional arrest subject to furnishing of security.

6 Feb 2026

The plaintiff, Om Freight Forwarders Limited, a company engaged in freight forwarding and bunker supply, filed a civil suit under the Admiralty (Juris...

21 22 23 24 25

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)