Search Results for "Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976"

332 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 332 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Re-Development Agreement and Bye-Law Amendments in Co-operative Housing Society. Court Holds That Re-Development Agreement and Bye-Law Amendments Without General Body Approval Are Void Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, B. K. Corporation, an association of persons, filed a writ petition challenging the validity of a re-development agreement and bye-law...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Appeal Against Single Judge's Dismissal of Petition on Extension of Tenure of Raichur Municipal Councillors. Appeal Focuses on Interpretation of Section 503 of Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act and Exclusion of Administrator Period from Five-Year Term.

The writ appeal arose from the dismissal of W.P.No.202910/2025 by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka, which had been filed by 23 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Appointment of Associate Professor for Lack of Bonafide Public Interest. Petitioners failed to establish locus standi as they were not competitors for the post and the petition was found to be motivated by personal interest.

The petitioners, three individuals claiming to be public-spirited persons, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Property Tax Levy by Panvel Municipal Corporation on Kharghar Node. Petitioners Lacked Locus Standi and Failed to Exhaust Statutory Remedy of Appeal Under Section 406 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

The petitioners, Kharghar Co-op. Housing Societies Federation and an individual resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Transport Authority in Motor Vehicles Act Case on Vehicle Replacement Rule. Kerala Motor Vehicle Rule 174(2)(c) Validated as It Does Not Exceed Section 83 and Serves Public Safety by Prohibiting Older Vehicle Replacements.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a dispute concerning the validity of Rule 174(2)(c) of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, which allows the tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows BDA's Appeal in Execution Proceedings: Right, Title or Interest Must Be Adjudicated Under Order XXI Rule 101 CPC. The Court held that an obstructor claiming title need not prove possession to be heard in execution proceedings.

The case involves an appeal by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) against the dismissal of its applications under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC in exec...