Search Results for "Arbitration award execution"

1089 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1089 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Substitution of Assignee in Pending Arbitral Proceedings Under Section 15 of Arbitration Act. Assignment of debt includes right to continue arbitration; unilateral appointment of arbitrator by original lender does not invalidate substitution.

The applicant, Integro Finserv Private Limited, an NBFC, filed three applications under Section 14 read with Section 11 read with Section 15 of the Ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Shareholder Dispute Over Hotel Company Exit — Holds That Arbitrator Exceeded Jurisdiction by Granting Relief Beyond Scope of Reference and Without Proper Valuation.

The judgment pertains to two Commercial Arbitration Petitions arising from an arbitral award dated 5th April 2016. The petitioners (Panchamias Group a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 1793 OF 2013

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Refer Dispute to Arbitration Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Joint Venture Agreements Not Signed by Appellant, No Arbitration Agreement Between Parties.

The appeal arose from an order dated 8 April 2004 passed by the learned trial Judge dismissing Notice of Motion No. 778 of 2004, which was an applicat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows MTNL's Appeal Against Arbitration Order in Bond Dispute with Canara Bank. The Court held that arbitration proceedings cannot continue without a written arbitration agreement and without the consent of all necessary parties, specifically CANFINA.

The case involves a dispute between Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL) and Canara Bank regarding bonds issued by MTNL. In 1992, MTNL floated bonds ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Group of Companies Doctrine to Larger Bench in Arbitration Dispute Over Software Agreement. Questions validity of applying the doctrine to bind non-signatory parent company to arbitration under Sections 8, 11, 35, and 45 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Cox & Kings Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Venue Change in Arbitration Dispute — Clause 19.3(b) of Agreement Held to Specify Seat, Not Venue, Under Section 20 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Dhule Municipal Commissioner, challenged an interim order dated 16/06/2024 passed by the sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Proceeding No....