Search Results for "survey"

571 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 571 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appellate Court Reviews Conviction Over Procedural Flaw in Naresh Kumar's Murder Case. High Court Examines Impact of Non-Compliance with Section 313, Cr.PC on Fairness of Trial

The appeal of Naresh Kumar, convicted of murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) with the aid of Section 34 IPC. The appeal is based o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Modifies High Court Judgment on Partition of Ancestral Properties. Respondents' entitlement to shares adjusted; self-acquired properties excluded from partition.

Civil Appeals challenge the judgment of the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, in R.F.A. No.3052 of 2010 and Cross-objection No. 103 of 2011. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Tax Collection Obligation on Mysore Sales Under Section 206C. Excise Contractors Deemed "Buyers" in Karnataka Liquor Vending Case, Appeal Dismissed

The application of Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regarding tax collection at source on the sale of alcoholic liquor, particularly focusing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

HPCL’s Eviction and Mesne Profit Dispute Upheld by High Court . Lease Expiry and Valid Termination Confirmed; Civil Revision Applications Dismissed, Mesne Profits Set at Rs. 93,227 Per Month

These Civil Revision Applications are filed by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL), challenging the eviction order and mesne profit determi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal Against Partition Judgment: Remand Ordered for Fresh Hearing. Wardha District Court sets aside previous judgments, mandates inclusion of all relevant parties for a fair trial on property dispute.

This appeal challenges the judgment and decree from Regular Civil Appeal No. 201 of 2015, dated 28.02.2022, by Ad-hoc District Judge-2, Wardha. The ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Final Partition Decree, Dismisses Late Will Submission by Defendant No.8 Defendant's attempt to modify shares based on a newly surfaced Will rejected; court emphasizes finality of judicial proceedings.

This Writ Petition challenges the rejection of Defendant No.8's application by the Joint Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nashik, which sought to frame ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Quashes State Decision to Shift Navi Mumbai Sports Complex, Reaffirms Public Interest. Judgment emphasizes the importance of accessible sports facilities, criticizes arbitrary land reallocation for commercial use, and mandates CIDCO to hand over land for the original sports complex.

The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenges the allocation of land originally designate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

State Government’s Shift of Sports Complex to Rural Area Quashed. Court Orders CIDCO to Revert Land for Sports Complex Development, Emphasizing Public Interest and Transparency

The State Government's decision to relocate the Government Sports Complex from Navi Mumbai to a rural area for commercial exploitation has been critic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Plaintiff’s Suit for Property Possession Upheld. Court Rules in Favor of Plaintiff’s Ownership Claim Despite Defendants’ Incomplete Sale Agreement Defense

This appeal was filed against the judgment and decree of the 2nd Ad-hoc Additional District Judge, Wardha, which overturned the decision of the Civil ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Rules in Favor of Petitioner, Overturns Minister's Decision on Ashram School Management . Legal jurisdiction and procedural adherence scrutinized in Writ Petition, emphasizing the roles of Minister and Secretary in school management decisions.

This document is a legal judgment from a Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner challenged an order passed...