Search Results for "statutory safeguards"

893 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 893 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order in Maharashtra Police Act Case — Lack of Material to Show Harm or Danger. Petitioner's involvement in two theft cases insufficient to justify externment under Section 56 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 as there was no evidence of witnesses unwilling to depose.

The petitioner, Pankaj Prakash Shimpi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the externment proceedings ini...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

GULFISHA FATIMA

The present appeals before the Supreme Court arise from a common judgment of the High Court of Delhi which affirmed the rejection of bail applications...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in POCSO and Child Marriage Case Due to Consensual Relationship and Marriage After Majority. FIR under Sections 64(1) BNS, 4(1) and 8 POCSO Act, and Sections 9, 10, 11 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act Quashed as Victim Attained Majority and Consented to Marriage.

The applicants, including the husband and his family members, sought quashing of FIR No.196/2025 registered at Telhara Police Station for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Drug Price Control Demand Against Pharmaceutical Company. Cream Vs. Ointment Distinction and Small Scale Industry Exemption Under DPCO 1995 Considered.

The writ petition arose from a dispute concerning the drug price control regime under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995 (DPCO 1995). The first pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in TADA Case Due to Involuntary Confession and Lack of Corroboration. Confession recorded under Section 15 of TADA Act found not voluntary as guidelines in Kartar Singh were not followed, and confession of co-accused not admissible without joint trial.

The appellant, Raja @ Ayyappan, was convicted by the Designated Court under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) for ...