Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in POCSO and Child Marriage Case Due to Consensual Relationship and Marriage After Majority. FIR under Sections 64(1) BNS, 4(1) and 8 POCSO Act, and Sections 9, 10, 11 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act Quashed as Victim Attained Majority and Consented to Marriage.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 123
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicants, including the husband and his family members, sought quashing of FIR No.196/2025 registered at Telhara Police Station for offences under Section 64(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Sections 4(1) and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, and Sections 9, 10, 11 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006. The FIR was lodged by Police Head Constable Rahul Tayade based on information that the victim had delivered a baby on 10.05.2025 and that her marriage was solemnized when she was 17 years old. The applicants contended that there was a love affair between applicant No.1 and the victim, and after families became aware, they performed the marriage according to Muslim rites on 02.06.2024. The victim had attained majority by the time of marriage. The court examined the facts and found that the victim was major at the time of marriage and the relationship was consensual. The court held that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of process of law and quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Quashing of FIR - POCSO Act - Prohibition of Child Marriage Act - Consensual Relationship - Marriage after Majority - The court considered whether FIR under Sections 64(1) BNS, 4(1) and 8 POCSO Act, and Sections 9, 10, 11 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act should be quashed when the victim and accused had a love affair and married after the victim attained majority. Held that since the victim was major at the time of marriage and the relationship was consensual, continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process. FIR quashed. (Paras 1-10)

B) Criminal Law - Quashing of FIR - Inherent Powers - Section 482 CrPC - Abuse of Process - The court exercised inherent powers to quash FIR to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice, as the allegations did not disclose any offence after the victim attained majority and consented to marriage. (Paras 8-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and proceedings under the POCSO Act and Prohibition of Child Marriage Act can be quashed when the victim and accused entered into a consensual relationship and marriage after the victim attained majority.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and quashed FIR No.196/2025 registered with Telhara Police Station and all consequential proceedings.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR
  • POCSO Act
  • Prohibition of Child Marriage Act
  • Consensual relationship
  • Marriage after attaining majority
  • Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (09) 222

Criminal Application (APL) No.1128 of 2025

2025-09-26

Urmila Joshi-Phalke, Nandesh S. Deshpande

2025:BHC-NAG:9835-DB

Mr. S. V. Sirpurkar, Ms. Sneha Dhote, Mr. Yash Venkatraman

Mirza Aslam Beigh Rashid Beigh, Shaikh Shafique Shaikh Barkat, Shaheda Bi Shaikh Shafique

State of Maharashtra, Rahul Popatrao Tayade (Complainant), XYZ (Prosecutrix)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application for quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No.196/2025 and all consequential proceedings

Filing Reason

Allegations of sexual assault and child marriage based on a relationship that was consensual and marriage after victim attained majority

Issues

Whether the FIR under POCSO Act and Prohibition of Child Marriage Act should be quashed when the victim and accused had a consensual relationship and married after the victim attained majority.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicants argued that there was a love affair between applicant No.1 and the victim, and marriage was performed after families became aware, with the victim being major at the time of marriage. State opposed the application, submitting that the victim was minor at the time of marriage and the FIR disclosed cognizable offences.

Ratio Decidendi

When the victim has attained majority and the relationship is consensual, continuing criminal proceedings under POCSO Act and Prohibition of Child Marriage Act would be an abuse of process of law, warranting quashing under Section 482 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

Present applicants seek exception to challenge, at the initial stage, the First Information Report... The present application is filed by the applicants, who is husband and other family members, on the ground that there was a love affair between the applicant No.1 and the victim.

Procedural History

FIR registered on 02.07.2025; applicants filed Criminal Application (APL) No.1128/2025 for quashing; reserved on 11.09.2025; pronounced on 26.09.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: 64(1)
  • Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012: 4(1), 8
  • Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006: 9, 10, 11
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Municipal Tax on Mobile Towers Following Supreme Court Precedent. Mobile Towers Held Taxable as 'Land' Under Municipal Corporation Acts Despite Absence of Specific Definition.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Pune Municipal Corporation Resolution and Circular on Compounding Fees for Building Irregularities. Resolution Held Ultra Vires MRTP Act and BPMC Act as No Power to Levy Such Charges for Regularization Under Section 53(3).