Search Results for "prima facie material"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "prima facie material"

6834 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6834 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Defendant restrained from using mark 'cothagiri' for coffee products as it is phonetically and structurally similar to plaintiff's registered trademark 'Cothas'.

14 Sep 2016

The case involves a trademark infringement dispute between two coffee companies. The appellant, M/s Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd., was the defendant in the...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Criminal Revision Applications Challenging Cognizance and Process Issuance in CBI Corruption Case. Sanction for Prosecution Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Not Required for Private Complaints Under Section 190 CrPC.

22 Dec 2021

The judgment pertains to four criminal revision applications filed by multiple applicants challenging the order of the Special Judge (CBI) at Goa, who...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.

17 Oct 2018

These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.

10 May 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Accused No.1's Bail Appeal in Malegaon Bombing Case Charging Conspiracy and Terror Offences. Appeal Questions Special Court's Rejection of Bail Application Pursuant to Supreme Court Direction to Exclude MCOC Act Provisions.

25 Apr 2017

The judgment under consideration arises from a criminal appeal filed by Accused No.1 against the Special Court's order rejecting her bail application ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Stayed Impugned Re-Assessment Proceedings Under Income Tax Act – Challenge to Section 148 Notice for AY 2009-2010. Petition Filed Against Order Rejecting Objections and Seeking Re-Opening of Assessment Under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

25 Apr 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Relief in Arbitration Dispute Over IPL Media Rights — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Established Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court held that the appellant failed to demonstrate a prima facie case for interim relief as the termination of media rights agreements by the respondent was within contractual rights.

23 Feb 2011

The appeal arose from a judgment and order dated December 20, 2010, passed by a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Arbitration Petition ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in NIA Case Citing Delay in Trial and No Prima Facie Evidence of Terrorist Act. The court held that the bar under Section 43D(5) of UAPA is not absolute and can be relaxed when the right to speedy trial under Article 21 is violated, and the accused has been in custody for over two years without trial.

29 May 2023

The appellant, Imran Ahmed, was arrested in connection with Spl.C.C.No.141/2021 for offences under Sections 16, 18, 20 of the Unlawful Activities (Pre...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Charges Against Accused in Securities Scam Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inordinate Delay. Petitioners were directors of a company accused of cheating and criminal conspiracy in securities transactions, but the court found no prima facie case and held that the 25-year delay violated their right to speedy trial.

22 Aug 2023

The petitioners, Dhyan Investments & Trading Company Ltd. and Tushar Sarda, were accused nos. 3 and 4 in Special Case No.2 of 1998 pending before the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — No Deceptive Similarity Between STIMULIV and STIMULET for Different Pharmaceutical Products. The court held that the mark 'STIMULET' used for an allopathic breast cancer drug does not infringe the registered mark 'STIMULIV' used for Ayurvedic liver medicines due to differences in nature, trade channels, and customers under Section 29(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

20 Jan 2023

The case involves a trademark infringement and passing off dispute between two pharmaceutical companies. The appellant, Corona Remedies Private Limite...

20 21 22 23 24

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)