Search Results for "notice before mutation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Promotion in Cooperative Bank, Reverses High C...
Supreme Court Grants Leave and Examines High Court's Interpretation of Section 3...

Search Results for "notice before mutation"

731 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 731 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Cancellation of Sale Deed — Finds Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Suit Without Considering Plaintiff's Share in Ancestral Property. Sale Deed Executed Without Plaintiff's Consent and Without Notice Under Section 135(d) of Gujarat Land Revenue Code is Voidable.

11 Mar 2026

The appellant, Rukhiben Devaji Rajaji Thakor, filed a First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition for Mutation Entry Correction Under Section 73AA of Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879 — Directs Revenue Authority to Rectify Entry Based on Civil Court Decree. The Court held that revenue authorities are bound to give effect to civil court decrees and cannot refuse mutation on grounds of pending litigation.

6 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Dudhliben, through her legal heirs, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Gujara...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Demolition Order in Land Dispute Case — Violation of Natural Justice and Property Rights. Order passed under Section 63 of the Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879 without notice or hearing set aside as arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21, and 300A of the Constitution.

20 Jan 2026

The petitioner, Harishbhai Vrajlal Bathia, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat High Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Conveyance Deed and Society Registration Under MOFA and MCS Act — Conveyance Deed Executed Without Consent of Allottees and Without Compliance with Section 11 of MOFA Held Void. The court held that the Competent Authority under MOFA cannot execute a conveyance deed in favour of a society that does not represent all allottees, and the registration of such society under the MCS Act without the consent of all allottees is invalid.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Maki Homi Chibber, an allottee of a flat in a building constructed under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Conveyance Deed and Society Registration Under MOFA and MCS Act — Conveyance Deed Executed Without Proper Authority and Society Registration Based on Defective Deed Set Aside. The court held that the Competent Authority under Section 11 of MOFA must conduct a proper inquiry before executing a conveyance, and a society registered under the MCS Act based on an invalid conveyance cannot be sustained.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Maki Homi Chibber, through her constituted attorney, filed a writ petition challenging a conveyance deed dated 30.04.2019 executed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL as Abuse of Process, Imposes Costs for Misusing Public Interest Litigation Jurisdiction to Serve Vested Interests. The Court found that the petitioner, under the guise of environmental protection, sought demolition of a Koli community crematorium on Erangal Beach, Malad, which was already achieved by the time of hearing, and the petition was motivated by extraneous considerations.

29 Sep 2022

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Chetan Kodarlal Vyas, finding it to be an abuse of the PIL jurisdiction. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Tahsildar's Order Levying Royalty on Excavated Material for Construction. Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Empower Tahsildar to Levy Royalty on Material Excavated for Building Foundation or Plinth.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, P.S.C. Pacific, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11/8/2010...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Waqf Property Dispute. Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Application Rejected as Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Limitation Was a Mixed Question of Fact and Law.

23 Apr 2021

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Aurangabad Smart City Development Corporation Limited and the Municipal Corporation, Aurangaba...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Section 100 CPC as Courts Below Correctly Appreciated Evidence and Held Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Joint Family Property.

4 Sep 2015

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs in a partition suit, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenancy Declaration Petition Due to Lack of Evidence of Cultivation and Payment of Rent. Petitioners failed to prove they were tenants under Section 70(b) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

22 Mar 2005

The case involves a writ petition filed by several individuals (the petitioners) challenging the judgment and order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribuna...

20 21 22 23 24

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)