Search Results for "interest expenses"

4314 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4314 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Hears Batch of Motor Accident Claims Appeals Against Awards of Additional MACT, Kumta. Claimants Seek Enhancement of Compensation and Insurers Challenge Liability in Multiple Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Cases.

The matter involves a batch of appeals filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award dated 31.12.2011 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Revision Against MACT Award for Lack of Permission Under Section 170 of Motor Vehicles Act. Insurance Company Cannot Challenge Award on Merits Without Tribunal's Permission When Owner and Driver Are Exparte.

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Determines Liability for Removal of Sunken Barge Wreck Under Section 14 of Indian Ports Act, 1908. Supreme Court Had Earlier Remanded the Matter for Deciding Pure Question of Law Regarding Whom Liability Falls Upon for Clearing the Wreckage.

The case involved a writ petition filed by JSW Steel Limited (formerly ISPAT Industries Limited) challenging the suspension of its permission to use M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Part, Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable to Pay and Recover. Deceased aged 35, self-employed, entitled to 40% future prospects; loss of consortium enhanced to Rs.40,000 per claimant.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the widow and children of Binod Pande, who died in a vehicular accident on 28th August 2012. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Award in Motor Accident Case — Insurance Company Liable for Negligent Parking of Vehicle. Truck parked without indication on highway causing accident; insurer held jointly liable with owner for compensation under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 13th March 2009, when the respondent no.1, a minor aged 10 years, was traveling in a Tata Magic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal for Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased was a Software Engineer Aged 39 Years. Tribunal's multiplier of 13 and failure to add future prospects were corrected, resulting in enhanced compensation of Rs.1,18,99,000/-.

The appeal was filed by the claimants, being the wife, minor daughter, and parents of the deceased Annappa Mallappa Hipparagi, against the judgment an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Decides Appeal for Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Injury Case of Minor Claimant. The Court Examines Appropriate Methodology for Calculating Compensation for Minors Considering Notional Income, Multiplier, and Future Prospects Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

This is an appeal filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the petitioner in MVC No.1282/2019 seeking enhancement of compensation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Apportionment of Liability Between Two Tortfeasors Upheld. Claimants awarded enhanced compensation for death of Sagun Ghadi in a truck collision, with 50% liability each on both truck owners and insurers.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal heirs of Sagun Ghadi, who died in a collision between two trucks on 10th September 2005...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Compensation Case — Future Prospects Awardable in Permanent Disablement Cases. Loss of earning capacity must consider functional disability and actual income, not merely physical disability percentage.

The appellant, Pappu Deo Yadav, was a 20-year-old data entry operator earning ₹12,000 per month when he suffered a serious motor accident on 18.05.2...