Search Results for "flat scheme"

1014 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1014 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction of Car Washer for Rape and Criminal Trespass — Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR.

The appellant, Alfred Fernandes, was convicted by the Fast Track Special Court, POCSO, Panaji, Goa, for offences under Sections 448, 354 and 376 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Demolition of Unauthorized Constructions in Splendor Complex. Unauthorized structures built in violation of sanctioned plans and DCR are liable for demolition under Section 53 of MRTP Act, 1966.

The case involves six writ petitions filed by residents of Splendor Complex, JVLR, Andheri (East), Mumbai, challenging the demolition of certain struc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance Due to Non-Compliance with Order VI Rule 17 CPC and Lack of Pleading Readiness and Willingness. Plaintiff failed to amend plaint to incorporate essential facts regarding readiness and willingness to perform contract, leading to dismissal of suit.

The plaintiff, Neeta Sawant, filed a suit for specific performance of an Agreement for Sale dated 30th September 2016, by which the defendants agreed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Case — Works Contract Valuation Must Exclude Land Value Under Rule 58. Land value deduction under Rule 58 of MVAT Rules is mandatory for works contracts involving transfer of immovable property, and the Tribunal erred in restricting deduction to 20%.

The Appellant, Oasis Realty, an association of persons registered under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act) and Central Sales Tax Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Allotment of Land to Judges' Cooperative Housing Society. Allotment of land by MHADA to a cooperative housing society formed by judges was held to be legal and not arbitrary.

The petitioner, Ketan Tirodkar, a citizen of India, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the allotment of...