Search Results for "default dismissal"

1820 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1820 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Cross Execution Applications in Share Sale Dispute, Holds Loan Included in Consideration. The court upheld the decree for specific performance of an email agreement, ruling that the loan amount of Rs.10,32,55,000/- was part of the Rs.36.75 crore consideration.

The case arises from a dispute between two groups, the Kotharis and the Agarwals, who were equal shareholders in a company called Special Ear, Nose an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Tenants for Default in Rent Payment, Dismisses Landlords' Cross-Appeal on Subletting. The Court held that Defendant Nos. 2 and 3 were direct tenants of the Plaintiffs and not sub-tenants, and decreed eviction solely on ground of default in payment of rent.

The case involves cross proceedings between the landlords (Plaintiffs) and the tenants (Defendant Nos. 2 and 3) concerning a suit premises in Pune. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Respondents in Contempt for Breach of Injunction Order. Resolutions Increasing Authorised Capital and Alloting Shares While Restrained from Exercising Rights on Shares Amount to Wilful Disobedience.

The appeal arose from Suit No.3121 of 2004, where the appellants (original plaintiffs, Gopal L. Raheja & Anr.) claimed that the respondents (original ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Challenging Eviction Decree — Valid Service of Demand Notice and Application of Section 12(3)(a) of Bombay Rent Act Upheld. Tenant's refusal of notice and monthly tenancy established; Appellate Court's findings not perverse.

The petitioners, Gorakh Rambhau Chothve and Jalinder Rambhau Chothve, were defendants in a suit for eviction and arrears of rent filed by the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular Second Appeal Against Decree Declaring Suit Darga as Personal Property. The Wakf Board Appealed the First Appellate Court’s Finding that It Failed to Adduce Evidence of Wakf Declaration under Sections 4 and 5 of the Wakf Act, 1995.

The appeal arose from a suit for injunction filed by the plaintiffs, who along with defendant No.1 claimed joint ownership and management of the suit ...