High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Awards. Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution Seeking Quashing of Awards in Various Industrial Disputes.
4 Nov 2022...
Search Results for "deemed industrial dispute"
1717 result(s) found
Found 1717 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows BSNL's Petition Against MSEDCL for Wrongful Tariff Categorization Under Electricity Act, 2003. Telecom Service Provider Cannot Be Classified as 'Commercial' for Electricity Tariff Purposes; MERC Must Determine Correct Category.
16 Apr 2024The Petitioner, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), a telecom service provider and a central public sector enterprise, filed a writ petition under Artic...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Fresh Appointment as Punishment in MSRTC Disciplinary Matter — Industrial Court's Dismissal of Complaint Confirmed. The Court held that an order of fresh appointment issued by the employer can be a valid punishment and does not presuppose dismissal, relying on the principle that the employer has discretion to impose a lesser punishment.
21 Jan 2016The petitioner, Anil Vaijnath Arbad, was a Class C employee of the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) who joined service on 07.03.19...
- 91
High Court
High Court of Bombay Determines Territorial Jurisdiction of Labour Courts Under MRTU Act for Employees Outside Maharashtra. The Court considers whether the principle that situs of employee determines jurisdiction (GlaxoSmithKline) is overruled by subsequent Supreme Court rulings.
3 Nov 2025The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of matters, including Appeal No.585 of 2009 and several writ petitions, involving employees and trade unions fr...
- 37
High Court
KAHC010645132024_1
19 Dec 2025The present batch of writ appeals is directed against a common order dated 26.09.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnatak...
- 42
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Workman's Petition and Dismisses Establishment's Petition in Service Regularization Dispute — Workman Granted Permanency from 1990 but Denied Back Wages from 1992 Due to Lack of Evidence of Willingness to Work.
21 Dec 2016The judgment involves two writ petitions arising from the same Industrial Court order dated 20/03/1997. The first petition was filed by the workman, A...
- 91
High Court
Bombay High Court Sets Aside Industrial Court Stay on Promotion/Transfer Order in Newspaper Company Dispute — Transfer as Condition of Service Upheld in Absence of Malafides. Court holds that Industrial Court cannot interfere with transfer order issued in exigencies of service when transfer is an express condition of employment and no prima facie case of malafide is made out.
2 Jul 2024The Bombay High Court dealt with a petition challenging an interim order of the Industrial Court, Thane, which temporarily restrained the petitioners ...
- 317
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Appellants Failed to Prove Title and Possession. Land Acquisition Under KIAD Act Upheld as Appellants Were Not Owners and Compensation Was Already Paid to Recorded Owner.
17 Aug 2020The appellants, Sri K. Srinivas Murthy and Smt S.V. Padma, filed a writ appeal against the order of a Single Judge dismissing their writ petition chal...
- 111
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Reinstatement Order in BEST Employee Dismissal Case — Unauthorized Absence Justified by Disability and License Renewal. Court holds that dismissal for absence was disproportionate and amounted to victimization where employee had valid reasons for leave and employer acted on unsubstantiated disability fraud allegations.
9 Aug 2024The petitioner, Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST), challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, which allowed...
- 465
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Principal Employer in Contract Labour Dispute — No Automatic Absorption Without Section 10 Notification or Sham Contract Finding. Contract Labourers Cannot Be Deemed Employees of Principal Employer Under CLRA Act Absent Prohibition Notification or Evidence of Sham Contract.
5 Dec 2022The case involves an appeal by Kirloskar Brothers Limited (the principal employer) against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court which upheld ...
- 271
